My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CHC 1979-08-20
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1980
>
Minutes
>
CHC 1979-08-20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2018 10:49:53 AM
Creation date
6/19/2018 10:54:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1979
Meeting date
8/20/1979
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1979-08-20
(Related)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1980\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of the previous decision of this commission which was having <br /> three separate options in addition to the status quo, then an <br /> amendment of an amendment under this rule cannot be made <br /> since there already is an amendment. Assuming Mr. Omonaka' s <br /> motion is an amendment. <br /> MR. TRULSON: Mr. Omonaka has stated that his <br /> was not an amendment. <br /> MR. OMONAKA: Let's get a ruling. <br /> MR. ODA: I think Mr. Omonaka's motion was an <br /> amendment of the previous adoption of the three options by <br /> deleting the two other options. <br /> CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Then Mr. Trulson 's. . . <br /> MR. ODA: Is a motion to amend an amendment, <br /> so, it looks like it is out of order. <br /> MR. TRULSON: Mr. Chairman, I would like to <br /> make a motion to amend the Rules of Procedure to reconsider, <br /> add to, or amend, those sections of the Charter that have <br /> already been moved on previously. <br /> MR. ODA: _ What was that? A motion to reconsider? <br /> MR. TRULSON: I would like to make a motion <br /> to amend the Rules of Procedure in order to reconsider, add <br /> to, or amend, those sections of the Charter that may have been <br /> moved on previously. <br /> MR. CADINHA: Mr. Chairman. To clarify a little <br /> confusion here. Mr. Oda, what was your ruling on Mr. Trulson 's <br /> motion? <br /> MR. ODA: It ' s out of order. <br /> MR. CADINHA: It is out of order? <br /> CHAIRMAN SAKATA: Mr. Trulson 's motion was to <br /> amend the Rules of Procedure to reconsider all the others? <br /> MR. TRULSON: Basically, to get back to the <br /> same subject, yes. <br /> MR. SCHUTTE: Mr. Chairman. Mr. Oda, is that <br /> in line? <br /> MR. ODA: I would think not, Mr. Schutte. <br /> Basically, I think that motion is a motion to reconsider and <br /> based on the broad scope of that motion, I do believe it ' s <br /> not timely at this time because it is to reconsider all. . . <br /> MR. TRULSON: It' s to reconsider 3-2. <br /> MR. ODA: Reconsider 3-2? Then it would be <br /> timely. <br /> -10- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.