Laserfiche WebLink
situation which you have heard before and all this sort of thing. <br /> But it is a fact of life today. Government spending has to be <br /> limited and the only way _ouu are going to do it is if you do it <br /> by law. <br /> Good government needs these fixed guidelines <br /> that we are talking about within which to operate because no <br /> business can stand to just float. Not really knowing how much <br /> money it is going to have. This is where we get into problems. <br /> But I fully believe that you are going to have to accompany <br /> this by mandating in the charter that we use zero base budgeting,- <br /> on the county level. I take it that you know what I am talking <br /> about when I say zero base budgeting. You start from zero every <br /> year rather than saying, okay, you can have 10% over what you <br /> had last year. Because the minute you say that, this person , <br /> or any person is going to take that 10% and then probably try <br /> to get two or three more. It ' s human nature. So you have got <br /> to start from zero and go up. We can ' t continue to add 10% or <br /> 15% or 20% a,:,year to each department the way we have been doing. <br /> There is no way. And unless , again, that you tell people you <br /> are going to start from zero and justify every item. in your <br /> budget, they are not going to do it. It is much easier to do <br /> it the other way around. <br /> I would move on to representative_-districts. I <br /> think to get continuity that if we went by representative <br /> districts and elected half of them every two years, this would <br /> split the thing pretty well . You might have to fine tune that <br /> but at the moment that would be my suggestion. There are a <br /> number of reasons for that you have probably heard already. <br /> But, first of all , it would make a councilman closer to his <br /> constituents and despite what Councilman Dahlberg has said it <br /> has been my opinion that rather than all nine councilmen <br /> representing each and everybody, even in Ka'u, this just simply <br /> gives you nine people to pass the buck instead of one. It ' s <br /> harder to pin down one out of the nine or any one of them than <br /> it is if you have someone responsible for and to you. It is <br /> just thatI-plain. <br /> Maybe more important, the campaign spending <br /> has gone to ridiculous lengths because you have to campaign <br /> around the entire island even though you say you are a council- <br /> man from Ka'u. Does that make much sense? To spend $20 , 000 or <br /> $30,000. -Not really. So it would certainly give more people <br /> an opportunity to get involved. They wouldn ' t have to go out <br /> and try to scare up this big money. The person would be there <br /> and more representative. Closer to the people. I think it <br /> is an idea. That its time is here. I think in that same area <br /> there is something that you are going to have to look closely -at. <br /> At present, to the best of my knowledge at least, there is no <br /> provision in the County Charter for replacing a councilman who <br /> is disabled for some reason or other. <br /> I don 't particularly care how this is worked <br /> out. It seems to me like that a basic document which this is <br /> has to provide for continuity in government and this goes_ - <br /> even to the councilmen because you should have a right to <br /> - 18 - <br />