Laserfiche WebLink
most objectively because he neededthe votes in both areas in <br /> order to win. The voters of West Hawaii voted for 4 members. <br /> of the board and were the constituents of the majority. <br /> The concept of fairly meeting the needs of the <br /> East and the West through the" at=large elebtion , was continued <br /> in the 2nd County Charter under which we now operate. I now <br /> vote for 9 councilmen. My vote is effective. <br /> However, the effectiveness of the power of my <br /> vote is only oneof my goals for the selection of the makeup <br /> of the county council . The other goals are fairness and an <br /> acceptable differentiation of candidates. . <br /> By fairness , I mean both one-man ,one-vote and <br /> an equal opportunity for political participation. The one- <br /> man, one-vote principle is required by the Constitution. <br /> Equal opportunity for political participation is an aspect of <br /> fairness that could mean different things to different groups <br /> of people. To me, this aspect of fairness is especially <br /> relevant to areas with rapidly growing population. The large <br /> influx of people upsets the traditional balancesr_of political <br /> power. Changes must be made in order to accommodate <br /> —the <br /> increase in population is some districts , otherwise, the areas <br /> of little growth will offer political opportunities at the <br /> expense of the newly populated areas. <br /> By differentiation of candidates , I mean that <br /> the number of councilmen coming up for election at one time be <br /> limited in number so that I am able to distinguish the attitude, <br /> behavior, and skills of each candidate. To illustrate what <br /> I mean by two extreme examples--when voting for one office, I <br /> need deC'z-de only between two candidates. I can identify and <br /> evaluate each candidate. However, if I were required to vote <br /> for a hundred offices, I will be faced with an avalanche of <br /> 200 candidates. For example, the election of most of the <br /> offices becomes meaningless because I cannot properly identify <br /> and evaluate the candidates. <br /> Summarizing my criteria for the selection of <br /> the system for the election of the county council are. . .first; <br /> the effectiveness of my councilmen in the legislativecess. <br /> Second. . .firness. Third. . .differentiation of o,andidates. <br /> I have already pointed out that now because I <br /> am a constituent of all the councilmen, I hadpower over the <br /> county legislative process . However, under the present system, <br /> a district with a popultion of only a fraction of the population <br /> of Kona has one councilman running at-large from his district, <br /> whiCle Kona with a much larger population also runs one <br /> councilman. I feel this is unfa ir. <br /> Also, under the present system, I vote for <br /> 9 councilmen. Assuming two candidates to each office, I must <br /> keep track of 18 candidates. This isA number much too large <br /> for me to differentiate between candidates. I cannot identify <br /> -38- <br />