My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CHC 1979-05-22 PH
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1980
>
Minutes
>
Public Hearing
>
CHC 1979-05-22 PH
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2018 9:40:35 AM
Creation date
6/19/2018 9:40:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1979
Meeting date
5/22/1979
Type
MIN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and evaluate all 18 candidates. So I feel that the present <br /> system of 9 at-large elected councilmen does not meet my <br /> criterion of differentiation of differentiation. <br /> A proposal for the election of the councilmen <br /> by districts has been made by some Kona organizations. I <br /> shall now assess this proposal on the basis of my criteria. <br /> The proposal calls for the assignment of <br /> the number of councilmen for each district on the basis of <br /> the population of the district so that each councilman ' will <br /> represent and be chosen from an equal number of people. <br /> This aspect of the proposal is fair. <br /> The election by district proposal calls for <br /> the election of up to three councilmen in any one district. <br /> This number allows good differentiation of candidates. <br /> I shall now discuss the effectiveness of the <br /> power of my vote over the County legislative process under <br /> this proposal. <br /> Issues may be settled by elected officials <br /> on the basis of goodwill or charity. But the final nitty- <br /> gritty of decision-making in a showdown of conflicting <br /> interests is the power of the majority vote. For as you are <br /> aware, in our democratic political system, the decision is <br /> made by a majority vote. In a council of 9 members, 5 votes <br /> passes the motion. <br /> The population of East Hawaii centered in <br /> Hilo is far larger than the population of West Hawaii centered <br /> in Kona. Thus , on the basis of population, the larger number <br /> of Councilmen would come from the Hilo area and vicinity. <br /> These councilmen would have the common interest of a common <br /> area and form a lasting coalition . In a council of 9 members , <br /> all it takes is, a coalition of 5 members to exercise control. <br /> The other 4 members have no power. <br /> Because of the division of the county into <br /> two areas of activities through geography and by tradition , <br /> and the far larger population is in East Hawaii , under the <br /> plan to elect the councilmen by districts , I would; as a Kona <br /> voter, be voting for the powerless minority of two. My real <br /> power over the county legislative process is reduced to zero <br /> for I am not a constituent of a majority of the councilmen. <br /> And where does the power go? Initially, the <br /> power goes to the councilman who is now free of the constraints <br /> of the Kona voters. He can decide an issue internal to Kona <br /> on the basis of the best interest, of himself and the voters of <br /> his own district who are his constituents. - He does not have to <br /> come to me or to the Kona 'people ' for votes. He is free to <br /> look after his own self-interest. He can act with total <br /> unconcern for the power of the Kona voters and can respond to <br /> the visible and invisible influencesthat are brought to bear <br /> on him by people and organizations 'with the wealth to lobby <br /> effectively. <br /> -39- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.