My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CHC 1979-06-05 SUBCOMMITTEE
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
1980
>
Minutes
>
Subcommittee
>
CHC 1979-06-05 SUBCOMMITTEE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2018 9:47:18 AM
Creation date
6/19/2018 9:47:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGE/MIN (Charter Comm.)
Agency
Charter Commission
Year
1979
Meeting date
6/5/1979
Type
MIN
Document Relationships
AGE CHC 1979-06-05
(Related To)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Charter Commission\1980\Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Based on that, I would kind of like to rule out a <br /> strict district representation , also. If we go 5 districts <br /> then we are talking about 5 councilmen and I think that would <br /> be too small a number to work with. If you double up, if you <br /> go 10, I think that would be too big, also. <br /> CHAIRMAN ISHIDA: Stuart, is districting based upon <br /> registered voters, valid? <br /> MR. ODA: I think you have to use population. <br /> Elected officials have to represent, in general, the population <br /> rather than inference or registered voters or non-registered <br /> voters, not just registered voters. Every court case that I <br /> have looked at based it on the population rather than on the <br /> registered voters. Registered voters is just one criteria of <br /> many that are looked at, but, generally speaking, if there is <br /> only going to be one criteria, then the key criteria will be, <br /> population. <br /> CHAIRMAN ISHIDA: In other words, if we try to <br /> consider our district based strictly upon registered voters <br /> alone, and nothing else, that is no good. <br /> MR. ODA: I don 't think it would be. <br /> CHAIRMAN ISHIDA: And if we go based upon population, <br /> what population count are we supposed to use? <br /> MR. ODA: Well , that is going to be another problem <br /> because nobody has an exact head count of our existing popula- <br /> tion . We do have some information compiled by the Research <br /> 4nd Development Department, but these are based on estimates, <br /> educated estimates, you might say, of the present population <br /> of the entire county. How accurate they are, we don ' t know. <br /> Again, these kinds of estimates have been sustained by the <br /> Supreme Court inbetween census periods. That is the only way <br /> you can get any kind of objective statistics because, obviously, <br /> you can ' t go around counting heads between census periods. <br /> CHAIRMAN ISHIDA: As I assume, now, we don ' t have any <br /> current count as far as what the population is, right? As far <br /> as the county is concerned? Are we somewhat forced to just <br /> rely upon what we have now, like we have the representative <br /> districts, and assume that to be applicable? <br /> MR. ODA: To answer that question , in a nutshell , I <br /> think the answer is, yes, with a qualification. For example, <br /> Table VII, of this Data Book, 1978, County of Hawaii , is <br /> really a population estimate and projection for the State of <br /> Hawaii by counties, 1975 to the year 2000. This commission <br /> can use this sort of thing which is compiled by, as I said, <br /> from public records and projected, as one way of comparing the <br /> present House of Representative districts with the population <br /> estimates on this sheet. <br /> -4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.