My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN CHARTER 2018-07-13 (2018-2020)
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2018
>
Minutes
>
MIN CHARTER 2018-07-13 (2018-2020)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 1:45:55 PM
Creation date
8/14/2018 3:47:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Charter Commission -1 July 13, 2018 <br />CHR. ADAMS: Just to comment, actually, on the executive session, if it's not <br />procedural and it's substantive, if all we had was a quorum of six, we wouldn't be <br />able to go into executive session, because you'd need two-thirds. So, two-thirds <br />of the 11 would be what would be required. <br />MR. HENRICKS: Just to—well, law requires that it's two-thirds vote, however, <br />it has to be at least a bare majority to which the board is entitled to. So, if you had <br />six people vote yes, that's a 100 percent, that's more than two-thirds, and you still. <br />have your bare majority. That's how the law reads. So, you could enter into an <br />executive session with six people, as long as all six voted. But, if five out of six <br />voted, you could not because you haven't met that six -vote threshold. <br />CHR. ADAMS: Okay. We can have that conversation because I'm not <br />understanding the two-thirds requirement then. Okay. <br />MR. HENRICKS: It's essentially two-thirds of those present, as long as it's at <br />least a bare majority to which the board is entitled. <br />MS. RICE: I have a question. You mentioned second reading. So, if we have a <br />Charter amendment or change, then do we have, as the Council does, two votes <br />on it? <br />MR. HENRICKS: The way the rules are currently constructed, and this could <br />come up for debate, too, we just—obviously, we didn't ask you folks how you felt <br />about what is required to pass a Charter amendment. For instance, the Council <br />has three readings and at least two-thirds of the entire membership is required to <br />pass it. Your rules are constructed now to where you'll have two readings and a <br />bare majority is sufficient, six people to pass at each reading. And these are, <br />essentially, readings on separate meeting days, so, you couldn't pass it. Do you <br />know what I'm saying? Like you do it in one meeting, it survives for the next <br />meeting, there's more opportunity for public comment, and then you'd have <br />another vote on that. And I am not exactly sure how that's going to happen going <br />forward with scheduling and timing, but I'm sure we'll cross that bridge when we <br />get there. But, that's how the rules are currently constructed. <br />MS. RICE: Okay, thanks. <br />MR. YOSHIMOTO: Good? Okay. Next topic, Sunshine Law. Okay, Sunshine <br />Law requires no discussing board business outside of a meeting, with a few <br />exceptions. Every meeting must be open to the public unless executive session is <br />allowed. Boards must provide notice, accept testimony and keep minutes, and <br />cannot consider matters not included on the agenda. <br />Page 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.