My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018-08-13 Hearing Transcript - Piilani Partners LLC REZ 727 SMA 18-070 REVOCATION SMA 334
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2018
>
2018-08-13 Hearing Transcript - Piilani Partners LLC REZ 727 SMA 18-070 REVOCATION SMA 334
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/7/2018 10:08:34 AM
Creation date
9/7/2018 10:08:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
KAY: Thank you, Mr. Chair. Motion carries, five, nothing for the continuance or deferral. <br />CLARKSON: We'll see you next month. <br />HALL: Wait, wait, so that's just for—we still have to do it for each one. Was your motion for <br />all three? <br />IKEDA: Yes. <br />HALL: Okay. <br />FUKE: I just wanted, Mr. Chairman, I just wanted some clarification. So, the motion, which <br />was passed, was to continue all three items to the next Planning Commission meeting, and <br />expressly for the purpose of determining the Commission's ability to impose any tax or <br />whatever, royalty whatever, and is there like a residual issue on the public trust doctrine. And, <br />the reason for my asking this question is largely because if there's a need for us to provide <br />additional or supportive information, that can be done. As you probably know, you know, Tom <br />Nance, who was here, testifying on behalf of the Applicant, too, he is a well-known, well- <br />respected hydrologist who was actually retained by the County to assist in their efforts on the <br />Keauhou aquifer system in the Kona system, so he is eminently qualified in that. So, if there's <br />any question as far as what he represented, you wanted to have it in writing or whatever have <br />you, that's the reason for my asking, so. <br />CLARKSON: Yeah, I would suggest that any information would be welcome and that it should <br />be forwarded to Corporation Counsel because she's going to be doing the legal review. Thank <br />you. <br />The discussion ended at 10:15 a.m. <br />Secretary's Note: <br />During the next hearing for Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless (USE 18-000076, Item <br />No. 4), Ms. Hata-Finley, in a discussion with Ms. Jackson, confirmed that the Commission's <br />September agenda had already been approved to be published and that publication deadlines <br />could not be met if the Piilani Partners applications were moved to the September agenda or if an <br />addendum to the September agenda was filed. Therefore, Ms. Jackson suggested to the <br />Commission that the Piilani Partners applications and the Cellco Partnership application be <br />moved to the October Commission meeting. Chair Clarkson asked Ms. Jackson to notify Piilani <br />Partners that their applications needed to be moved to October. <br />Subsequently, at 10:25 a.m., during the administrative matters/announcements portion of the <br />meeting, Ms. Hall informed the Commission that a request had been made by the Applicant's <br />representative, Sidney Fuke, that the motion for continuance regarding Piilani Partners be <br />clarified. Ms. Hall stated that Commissioner Ikeda's motion should be rephrased since it was <br />confirmed that the applications could not be moved to the Commission's September meeting. <br />EXHIBIT B <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.