My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
08-14-18 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2018
>
08-14-18 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 11:03:54 AM
Creation date
9/12/2018 9:07:56 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Goodenow: <br />Mr. Yoshimoto: <br />Mr. Robinson: <br />Mr. Goodenow: <br />Mr. Robinson: <br />Mr. Yoshimoto: <br />Mr. Goodenow: <br />Ms. Kahakalau: <br />I think we should definitely investigate this. I think if our corp. <br />counsel could do a comparison with the other provisions in the <br />code as to that and...right...should they even be writing it down on <br />these forms if...if it is an official gift...right? <br />In all fairness the form doesn't really designate or <br />differentiate...the questions that we're asking...right...so what <br />Rick is asking for is pretty straight forward...right if we want a <br />separate column for disposition... I mean that's fair...right but we <br />didn't ask that question...so we can follow-up on that...because <br />the questions are relevant. <br />If it said in the basement of the County building...hey that's fine <br />with me...but if it says take it home and use. <br />I've been corrected quite rightly you mean the County archives. <br />The safest place in the building...thank you. <br />So the question is...how would we do that...are we gonna ask for <br />further clarification. <br />Oh no...in my opinion...those gift statements are satisfactory <br />because they fulfilled all the requirements in the code but the board <br />is asking for... is for the clarification on the procedures and <br />processes so we can follow-up on that and if we can figure out a <br />way to best do that or not reinvent the wheel that's already there. <br />So there's two options but the recommendation would be to file <br />these gift statements because they've complied with their code <br />requirements. But on the board's end since you're asking these <br />questions which are relevant that we can follow-up by figuring out <br />which would be the best way to...to get that information. But I <br />don't think we can ask for anything further at this point because <br />the code doesn't require that unless... <br />With all deference...and I think you're on the right track with this <br />whole thing. I think these have met the requirements of the code <br />right and it's all it is a disclosure and I think we should let these <br />go...but look towards the future. <br />And in this case because of the June 30th deadline we'll have <br />technically a year you know to kind of... if we're gonna make any <br />changes to do it ahead of time so that they know...there's no <br />requirements that we may have and then as we prepare for next <br />year's filing then...then we'll have more information. And it is <br />tricky like when you do get a gift right what do you do with it I <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.