08-14-18 Regular Session Minutes

Home

Mr. Goodenow: Ms. Kahakalau: Mr. Wiseman: Ms. Kahakalau: Mr. Wiseman: Ms. Kahakalau: Mr. Wiseman: Mr. Goodenow: Mr. Wiseman: Mr. Goodenow: Mr. Wiseman: Mr. Goodenow: Ms. Sumner -Mack: And then we could take it out here... it's not do like... We don't really make motions but we got a consensus. I like that to put it right up front you that it is your privilege, your prerogative to have counsel present if you choose to. And then not having it in the rest of the document. I like that. I like that. Okay any other comments on any other. Yeah on 2.5 consideration and disposition of petition. The 30 day time limit bothers me. A 30 day time limit on anything as we know it how time flies...I mean it goes by in a blink. I'd rather...throughout this I see how the language were within a reasonable time thereafter and perhaps limit that and no later...but no later than 60 or 90 or something like that. But 30 is a...I think is time element that you would have to try to...it would come too fast for everything to be done. And when we look at the Kaua'i example, they have 90 days. Yeah. And then there's other languages that says within a reasonable time and then you could have it no more than X days. You know it's kind of odd that this is just for the amending the rules right...it's different from the other...it's separate. But I agree with you. This takes a written denial within 30 days. Yeah. It means we discussed it, we looked at it, we talked about it. What if we've not met or... I don't know. It seems to me that...as Ken says it's amending and so. It shouldn't take an inordinate amount of time. If you change it to just reasonable amount of time that everybody's opinion about reasonable could be different. Mr. Wiseman: Well you could still put a time there a reasonable time...period of time not to exceed 90 days. 20