My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
08-14-18 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2018
>
08-14-18 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2018 11:03:54 AM
Creation date
9/12/2018 9:07:56 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Goodenow: <br />Mr. Yoshimoto: <br />Mr. Goodenow: <br />Mr. Yoshimoto: <br />Mr. Goodenow: <br />Ms. Kahakalau: <br />Mr. Wiseman: <br />Mr. Goodenow: <br />Mr. Wiseman: <br />Mr. Goodenow: <br />Mr. Wiseman: <br />J, I'm wondering if you've had any experience with this. I mean <br />the way I read it usually is they have the board hearing, they hear it <br />and then they decide okay we're gonna do it or not and then...30 <br />days from that they have to either put it in writing or but how or <br />what's practically happened in the past? Any experience with this? <br />The reasonable time period is that's the usual standard so...what I <br />would suggest is you can put a time period...to give you know the <br />public and the board some expectation of what period you're <br />looking at but also allowing for continuances or stipulations to <br />continue cause as the board has seen in the past. You know some <br />things can take a long time to resolve right so there has to be an <br />option. <br />And it might be oh we're gonna deny it then cause we... <br />Right...If you're pressed for it right. <br />Well...why don't we...I would say...I'd say we should just put in <br />a reasonable time but I'm open to a cap if that's the will of the <br />board... that's my opinion. <br />Well I like the within...the reasonable time but then also the 90 <br />days because then at least we have and I think you know it <br />shouldn't take that long but if something happens that's the <br />maximum. <br />Yeah not to exceed 90 days. <br />Not to exceed 90 days okay. I can incorporate that. That's a good <br />one. <br />3.2 carrying on to page 6...number 6. This involves a form and <br />content of petition. <br />Oh right. That or rule 2? <br />I'm sorry...3.2. Alright the Honolulu language does not include <br />the terms "if any" when asking for name, address and telephone <br />number. Includes "if any"...I would take out the option..."if any". <br />Mr. Goodenow: I would support that. <br />Mr. Wiseman: You know it's hard to find someone without a phone number, if <br />they don't have a phone they're not gonna tell us anyway so. But <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.