My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018-08-08 SWAC Meeting Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Environmental Management
>
Solid Waste Advisory Committee (SWAC) - Inactive
>
2019
>
Minutes
>
2018-08-08 SWAC Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/18/2018 9:10:17 AM
Creation date
9/18/2018 9:06:51 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Mr. Araujo asked if the County bought the parcel from Shipman, and Mr. Quiamas said <br />Shipman’s indications are they want to lease. However, everything hinges on the outcome of the <br />final EA. The land acquisition and design cannot be completed until the final EA is done. <br /> <br /> Mr. Araujo said the intersection by Shipman Industrial Park is very dangerous, and it will <br />be bad if the general public has to go there. Mr. Quiamas said the DOT has a project to fund and <br />signalize that intersection during the next fiscal year. <br /> <br /> (2) New technologies. <br /> <br /> Chair Hayducsko said some members had asked him to check out BioEnergy Hawaiʻi. <br />He has been playing phone tag with Guy Kaniho. He will try to get some information about the <br />project and perhaps have Mr. Kaniho give a short presentation on it. <br /> <br /> Ms. Seckel said there are a lot of new technologies out there, but they are very specific as <br />to size of community, population centers, how much waste is generated, and what is trying to be <br />done. The SWAC need to narrow what they want to look at—are they looking to reduce <br />greenhouse gas emissions? Improve the sorting of recyclables? Improve the sorting of solid <br />waste residuals before going to the landfill? Once the Committee identifies what needs to be <br />improved, then a study can be done. <br /> <br /> Ms. Adams asked if the waste characterization was going to be updated, and Chair <br />Hayducsko said there is no plan to do a waste characterization study for the plan. However, if <br />the SWAC recommends it, they can make that suggestion. Ms. Seckel said there was a 2008 <br />study referenced in the 2009 plan, and she believes it would have similar results now. <br /> <br /> Ms. Adams said she was just asking the question, as she wonders whether things have <br />changed enough to warrant another study. <br /> <br /> Mr. Araujo said that being a hauler, he feels how tonnage is calculated is wrong. It is the <br />volume that should matter, not the weight. The landfill is not getting too heavy—it is getting too <br />full. <br /> <br /> Chair Hayducsko said waste composition studies are useful, but he is concerned because <br />they always get just a snapshot of the waste, whatever was dumped in that timeframe. The waste <br />could be very different in another hour. <br /> <br /> Dwight Miller (via speakerphone) asked to weigh in on this. He said a waste <br />characterization study could be done, focusing on those areas of greatest interest. Some major <br />demographic and social changes have occurred in the past 10 years, particularly with online <br />shopping and the packaging with that, and the types of plastics being used. A study would help <br />get a better feel for the recyclables that are to go into the various facilities being proposed. He <br />would like to do a waste characterization study and focus on those areas of particular interest to <br />the County and where the best opportunities are for pulling material out of the landfill. <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.