2018-08-16 Leeward Exh A (AMEND SPP 08-064)

Home

requirement, we’ll ask that when they have complied with conditions of approval, that they submit a status report, a final status report. CARR SMITH: Thanks for clarifying that. DARROW: Thank you. UNGER: Great, thank you. FUKE: Mr. Chairman, can I just make one additional comment in relation to Commissioner Vitousek’s question — UNGER: Yes. FUKE: — I guess you are asking about like trying to get a feel as far as like what level of vehicular movements on the part of the quarry. I’m just looking at the Special Permit for the quarry right now, the operation, and Condition E kind of reads as follows: “At the written request of the Department of Public Works, after the fifth anniversary of the issuance of the extended permit,” – in other words five years from, it would be three years from now because it was issued two years ago – “ the applicant shall prepare a Traffic Impact Analysis Report, at no cost to the County of Hawai‘i, for submission to the Department of Public Works. The applicant shall coordinate with the DPW on implementing the applicant’s pro-rate share of appropriate traffic mitigation measures, if any, should it be determined through the TIAR that improvements to the Waikoloa/Quarry road intersection are needed due to the applicant’s activity at the quarry. Access to Waikoloa Road shall comply with Chapter 22 of Hawai‘i County Code.” So, I can only surmise, but, I can’t say that it’s a fact, but the volume of traffic on the quarrying operation would probably be more significant than what’s being proposed by this batching plant operation. So, that, we can, you know, based on what the applicant is saying that, yeah, you know, probably no more than two in an hour during the course of the day. The quarrying, we don’t know. UNGER: Thank you. Carr Smith. CARR SMITH: A comment in regards to Mr. Vitousek’s comment about, or question, about the impact from the road, typically the County in their presentation they have photos showing what the road view is, and that wasn’t included. So normally we would see that. UNGER: In general, then, can you agree that you’ve read and reviewed the comments from the Planning Department and you are in agreement with the stipulations that are attached to this application to the approval of your request? FUKE: We, you know, the applicant has had a chance to review the staff’s prepared background report and the recommendation, and the only, and we agree with them, you know, but the only suggestion we have is that to consider going back to what we had originally proposed that is to say giving them a minimum ten year life, and then after that, tie these two projects by their hips. 9 EXHIBIT A