Laserfiche WebLink
There was a proposed cross easement to come across from the existing church property, and this <br />is where the arrow is showing, is the proposed location where that cross easement would come. <br />It's a vehicular easement. <br />Here is some site photos of the site. These are views of the property from across Highway 11. <br />The upper photo, the church facility is on the left-hand side, so the subject parcel is roughly in <br />this area, and the lower photograph, the subject parcel is on the right-hand side. You can see the <br />sign for the church here, and the subject parcel is generally in this area. Again, it's overgrown <br />with vegetation at this point. <br />And, here are some views of Highway 11 looking north toward Hilo. You've got, again, the <br />existing church sign here, and the subject parcel is in this general area, and the lower photo is a <br />view of Highway 11 looking south with the subject parcel here on the right-hand side. <br />The Planning Director is recommending approval of the Use Permit request with some <br />conditions. Since the Background and Recommendation Reports were sent to the Planning <br />Commission, there have been some additional correspondences that have come in. On October <br />25th, we received comments from the State Department of Transportation relative to Highway 11, <br />and there was a November 2nd response from the Applicant's representative responding to those <br />comments. And, today, we received a document from Sharon Nomura, and this is a Planning <br />Commission decision from back in the early 90's related to a proposed school on the church <br />property. So, you should have received that. <br />One other thing I should mention is based on comments received from Department of <br />Transportation, we are proposing an amendment to Condition No. 5 related to access from the <br />highway. We did send that to you as part of your packet. It's on the yellow sheet of paper here, <br />and essentially, it's just to address some of their additional concerns. They did state in their <br />comment letter that they are not in favor of a vehicular easement to connect the existing church <br />driveway and the proposed outreach driveway. I did have a chance to speak with DOT Planning <br />branch. They indicated that the concern was just the close proximity to Highway 11 and that <br />they would be more amenable to a cross easement should it be pushed farther back into the <br />property. So, the proposed amendment is just addressing that essentially saying that siting of any <br />vehicular easement between the subject parcel and the church tmk will require consultation with <br />DOT and should be included in plans submitted to the Department for Plan Approval. And, then <br />we also addressed their comment about not allowing parking in the highway right-of-way. And, <br />the Applicant essentially responded to DOT's comments saying that they were amenable to those <br />concerns and requirements. <br />With that, I'm happy to answer any questions on this application that the Commission may have. <br />CLARKSON: Are there any questions from the Commission for staff? If not, thank you. <br />KAY: Thank you. <br />CLARKSON: And, will the Applicant or their representative please come forward? <br />EXHIBIT D <br />3 <br />