Laserfiche WebLink
KNABLE: The project archaeologist was— <br /> <br />LIM: T.S. Dye and Colleagues. <br /> <br />KNABLE: —Tom, yeah, Tom Dye. It was Tom Dye, and so he had made the original <br />submittal, he had followed up I think once or twice after that, and then after that it was just the <br />developer that followed up, and our office a few more times. <br /> <br />VITOUSEK: And has there been any correspondence back and forth relating to it? <br /> <br />KNABLE: We got one message acknowledging that, you know, we sent over, in April we sent <br />over a copy of the plan and the letter from Tom Dye, you know, responding to the latest round of <br />comments on the plan. And we were told that they would take a look, they weren’t familiar with <br />the plan, they would take a look at it and get back to us. <br /> <br />VITOUSEK: So there has been comments that SHPD has issued on the plan? <br /> <br />KNABLE: This, yeah, this, as far as we are aware, the project archaeologist had responded to <br />the last set of comments in 2013, and provided an updated report addressing those comments— <br /> <br />VITOUSEK: Okay, so— <br /> <br />KNABLE: —so we are just waiting. <br /> <br />VITOUSEK: —SHPD reviewed the project in 2013, they submitted comments, most likely me, <br />and then there was another draft that came back— <br /> <br />KNABLE: Correct. <br /> <br />VITOUSEK: —and has not been reviewed by SHPD. <br /> <br />KNABLE: Correct. <br /> <br />VITOUSEK: Okay. Has the County Planning Department reviewed the preservation plan? <br /> <br />UNGER: Christian, can you — oh. <br /> <br />KAY: Yeah, not to an extreme level of detail, no. We defer to State Historic Preservation <br />Division on making the final determination on that. We, and I need to apologize. The applicant <br />did supply us with not only the preservation plan but also response from the archaeologist in <br />response to SHPD’s first set of comments or questions, and also supplied us with a traffic impact <br />analysis report; for sake of saving of paper we decided not to print those fairly large documents. <br />I apologize. In the future, and I’m happy to email that to you, but in the future when we have <br />those, we’ll make sure we provide them digitally at least so that you can review those. <br /> <br />VITOUSEK: Thank you. <br />12 <br />EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />