My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018-10-18 Leeward Exh C (AMEND REZ 926)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2018
>
2018-10-18 Leeward Exh C (AMEND REZ 926)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2018 11:08:13 AM
Creation date
12/12/2018 11:08:10 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
know, I’d hate to create another process for public access when we already have the existing <br />condition, and the only reason why it’s not being implemented at this point in time is because of <br />the review by a State agency. <br /> <br />UNGER: To clarify, all of our recommendations are just that, just recommendations. We are <br />not, our, Leeward Planning Commission is not making or asking for any additional requirements <br />at this time. It’s just, we are having a discussion and, I guess, Commissioners, you can <br />recommend anything you want. The County Council obviously will be making the final <br />decision. And, hopefully, between now and then whatever does come out of this, that’s the <br />opportunity for everybody to get involved in a discussion. So, anyways, this is a great <br />discussion. <br /> <br />LIM: For the record for the applicants, for both KD Acquisition and Hualalai Investors, we <br />concur with the mitigation condition that was read into the record by Christian just a little while <br />ago. <br /> <br />UNGER: Okay, and the rest of the recommendations from the Planning Department as— <br /> <br />LIM: That’s correct. <br /> <br />UNGER: —okay, great, thank you. <br /> <br />VITOUSEK: Would it be possible for me to make a recommendation that the Cultural <br />Resources Commission review the archaeological preservation plan and make a recommendation <br />on whether the Director should accept that. <br /> <br />UNGER: Let’s hold that thought, and the process will be to finish with the applicants, and then <br />we’ll open it for public comment, and then we’ll go ahead and ask for a motion, we’ll get a <br />second on the motion, and that’s when we can have our full discussion amongst the <br />Commissioners. So if there is no more questions with the applicants, thank you, you may be <br />seated. If there are more comments. <br /> <br />LIM: No, no further comments. <br /> <br />UNGER: Okay, thank you. You may be seated. At this time I’d like to open it up for public <br />testimony, if anybody is in the audience that would like to testify. Seeing none, I motion to close <br />public testimony. <br /> <br />YATES: So move. <br /> <br />KEALOHA: Second. <br /> <br />UNGER: Motion by Commissioner Yates, second by Commissioner Kealoha. All in favor? <br /> <br />COMMISSIONERS: Aye. <br /> <br />17 <br />EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.