Laserfiche WebLink
existing units, this is where Phase II, the general area where Phase II will be. They will actually <br />be located mauka of these structures, so they are quite at distance from the shoreline. <br /> <br />The Planning Director is recommending approval with conditions. To bring to your attention, <br />the Planning Department in collaboration with the applicant worked out some changes to the <br />condition to kind of clean up some of the history on this; since Phase I was completed, we took <br />out references to Phase I, and we took out references to the Change of Zone regarding the <br />effective date because the effective date for this particular SMA permit has changed over the <br />years with the amendments. As far as the conditions of the Change of Zone, they are still <br />applicable; those don’t go away. Additionally, Condition 7, the new Condition 4, we just have <br />our standard language that no improvements can be done in the 40-foot shoreline area without a <br />shoreline setback variance. I’d like to add one change based on the last discussion, and that <br />would be to our new Condition, this would be to our new Condition 7, and Commissioner <br />Vitousek asked that after the first sentence it will state, “The applicant shall comply with <br />mitigation and preservation plans approved by the Department of Land and Natural <br />Resources-State Historic Preservation Division (DLNR-SHPD) and the County Planning <br />Department.” So we go ahead and add that in there as well. <br /> <br />With that, that concludes our presentation. Do you have any questions? I’ll try to answer them. <br />Thank you. <br /> <br />UNGER: Great, thank you. Commissioners, any questions? \[None.\] <br /> <br />DARROW: Thank you. <br /> <br />UNGER: Would the applicants come forward at this time? Please raise your right hand. Do <br />you swear or affirm to tell the truth before the Planning Commission? <br /> <br />EADIE: I do. <br /> <br />UNGER: Please state your name and area of address, area of residence. <br /> <br />EADIE: Good morning, Chair Unger and Commissioners. I’m Dave Eadie. I represent KW <br />Kona Investors, LLC. My offices are located in Costa Mesa, California. <br /> <br />UNGER: Thank you. You can proceed with whatever presentation you have planned for the <br />Commission. <br /> <br />EADIE: Thank you. First of all, it’s nice to be back here, and privilege. I’ve been away from <br />the Commission for 15 years; the last time I appeared before your Commission was in 2003 <br />when we went through the land use entitlement process for Kohanaiki. Some of you may <br />remember that was a long drawn-out process, but I think it turned out very favorably for <br />everybody – the County, the community, as well as the developer. <br /> <br />So, that said, the only thing I have to really talk about today is, given the fact that the issues are <br />rather narrow, given that we only have two conditions that have lapsed, we’ve reviewed the <br />4 <br />EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />