Laserfiche WebLink
Giffin: I have a question. So if I understood you correctly, please correct me if I'm wrong, <br />it's my understanding that you said Mr. Vine implied to you that his card was current. Is <br />that correct? <br />Twentyfive: When I asked him he said, "no it expired." But up until that point, when we <br />would all discuss cards and so on, he never gave me any impression that it had expired. If <br />he knew that or not, I don't know. I don't know if he honestly knew that his card was <br />expired or not. But, my impression was that it was valid up until they came in. Then we all <br />found out it was expired. No, it's not something we look at all the time, and yes, we didn't <br />have it posted where we could...we lost track of that one, the most important one. <br />Fuke: Thank you. Andi, any questions? Can I ask the (Assistant) Corporation Counsel to <br />read the report regarding the license issued and recommended penalty? <br />Schoen: Yes, thank you Mr. Chair. The date of the original license was December 24, <br />2008. There's been no previous Rule 5-2 violations, but the licensee does have other <br />prior charges. One with respect to, in 2013, sale of liquor to a minor. There's also, in <br />2014, failure to have the liquor Rules and Regulations on the premise. Our <br />recommendation, basically, is that $1,000 fine be imposed with $250 suspended and that <br />$750 be payable to the Department of Liquor Control within thirty days of issuance of the <br />Decision and Order. The basis for that recommendation is just looking at the <br />circumstances of this violation, we feel like the licensee was not very forthright about the <br />time that the person in active charge left the premises. The worker said that the person in <br />active charge left at 6:00 P.M. The schedule shows 6:00 P.M. but you hear Ms. <br />Twentyfive saying she clocked out at 5:00 P.M. That's the basis for our recommendation. <br />Fuke: The recommended penalty is $1,000 with $250 suspended. We're into discussion <br />before going to a motion. Do you want to say anything or to clarify? <br />Twentyfive: Just quickly that I clocked out of the system at 5:00 P.M. but I stayed and <br />shopped and I had to pull the forklift in and so I left the building at 6:00 P.M. However, <br />and not exactly, around 45 minutes to an hour later, but I was not clocked in, just for <br />clarification. <br />Fuke: Thank you very much. Is there any discussion before the motion on the penalty? <br />Again, Counsel is recommending $1,000 with $250 suspended. <br />Mukai: Mr. Chair, I move to accept the recommendation of the (Assistant) Corporation <br />Counsel which is a $1,000 fine, $750 payable within thirty days, $250 suspended. <br />Fuke: Is there a second on that? <br />Giffin: No. <br />Fuke: We'II do a second for discussion purposes only. <br />Masuda: Yes, that's correct. <br />Giffin: Then I will second. <br />OCTOBER 18, 2018 - LIQUOR ADJUDICATION BOARD MINUTES 20 <br />