Laserfiche WebLink
Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 40 / Thursday. March 2, 1989 / Rules and Regulations <br />8917 <br />assurances to ensure compliance with make seeking a waiver advisable, we do <br />the Uniform Act rather than seek <br />approval of a certification application. A <br />• State agency must provide these <br />assurances, or obtain a certification. as <br />set forth in both the Act and regulation. <br />as a condition of receiving Federal <br />financial assistance. <br />However, in response to a concern of <br />the Department of Agriculture, agencies <br />who acquire under the procedures for <br />voluntary transactions, or persons <br />without the power of eminent domain, <br />will net be required to certify under <br />'section 305 of the Uniform Act. Any <br />agency that displaces persons will have <br />to provide assurances or be certified for <br />compliance with section 210 of the Act. <br />The purpose for providing exceptions <br />to the real property acquisition <br />procedures in !l 24.101(a) is to make it <br />clear that not all acquisitions are subject <br />to the requirements of Subpart B of this <br />regulation. The section is intended to <br />describe circumstances which would <br />exclude specific acquisitions from the <br />application of the regulation; It is not <br />intended to provide the basis for the <br />exclusion of an entire agency program. <br />Section 24.5 Mariner of Notice <br />Two comments were received an this <br />section. which is unchanged from <br />previous requirements In both the <br />Common and the faterim Final Roles. <br />One comment approved of the <br />requirement and the other comment <br />suggested that the notice to the owner of <br />the Agency's interest in acquiring <br />property described in 1 24.10¢(b) also be <br />personally served or sent by certified or <br />registered first class mail. No change <br />has been made. <br />Section 24.2 Administration of faintly - <br />funded Projects. <br />Two comments were received on this <br />section. whldr b essentially unchanged <br />from previous requirements, except for <br />the addition of the statutory <br />responsibility of the lead agency to <br />designate a cognizant agency in the <br />absence of agreement between Federal <br />agencies. Neither comment addressed <br />this change and no further change has <br />bean made. <br />Section 24.7 Federal Agency Waiver of <br />Regulations <br />Two comments were received which <br />were specifically related to this section. <br />One noted approval of the provisions as <br />written, the second asked for some <br />examples of a proper justification, or <br />some basis upon which to make a <br />decision. This section has already been <br />discussed *general fn connection with <br />comrmetrts on 124.1 BakAn a of lire <br />varlet(ofsl iatkni t r'hlch in 1 " <br />4• • <br />not believe it practical to provide <br />examples. -Examples have a tendency to <br />be both limiting and. conversely, to <br />serve as unreliable justifications or <br />precedents for expansive <br />interpretations. <br />The primary concern is that the <br />waiver of a non -statutory requirement In <br />the regulation does not reduce any <br />assistance or protection provided to an <br />owner or displaced person under this <br />part. There is little doubt that <br />requirements imposed by the Uniform <br />Act may. necessarily. create some delay <br />and administrative burden. Therefore, It <br />would be inappropriate to grant a <br />waiver based on the general proposition <br />of delay and administrative burden. The <br />Waiver proposal must be specific and it <br />must protect the rights of owners and <br />displaced persons and not be designed <br />to serve some convenience of the <br />requesting agency. <br />The proper implementation of this <br />provision of the regulation requires the <br />exercise of good judgement. with proper <br />concern for displaced persons. <br />Section 24.8 Compliance with Other <br />Lows and Regulations <br />Two comments were received on this <br />section. One said the list of authorities <br />should include a statute which was <br />already included. The second comment <br />suggested the inclusion of Executive <br />Order 12630, Governmental Actions and <br />Interference with Constitutionally <br />Protected Property Rights, and fila has <br />been done. • <br />This section was also revised to <br />emphasize that there may be other laws <br />and regulations to be complied within <br />implementing this regulation and the list <br />provided is not necessarily all inclusive. <br />Section 24.9 Recordkeeping and <br />reports <br />Section 24.9(o) Records. Four <br />comments were received on this section. <br />One appreciated the provision for <br />confidentiality of records. Another <br />asked for the "established <br />requirements" for "adequate records." <br />The adequacy of an's records is <br />determined by the ability those <br />records to demonstrate compliance with <br />this regulation regarding the agents <br />acquisition and displacement activities. <br />Two comments were concerned with the <br />3 -year retention period for records. One <br />suggested an extension to 5 years, the <br />other suggested a period of 3 years after <br />the project is completed. There is <br />nothing to prevent an Agency frog <br />retaining records for a period longer <br />tthraanne3rtyyears after finalpayment tun <br />pleted person. <br />MINA i sasnd.eowuer dtthe regulation to <br />require retention of records for S years <br />or in accordance with applicable <br />regulations of the federal funding <br />agency. <br />Section 24.9(c) Reports. Special <br />consideration and comment was <br />requested on the format and timing of <br />this report. Four comments were <br />favorable to both the format and timing <br />of the report. One comment agreed with <br />the formats but claimed the information <br />was needed on an annual basis. Two <br />comments approved of the timing, but <br />wanted the format changed. The final <br />respondent wanted both the timing and <br />the format altered. With the exception of <br />one suggested format change. to lump all <br />non-residential displacements together. <br />the proposed changes axe dearly related <br />to the specific program requirements of <br />the respondents. As such, it would be <br />inappropriate to address these concerns <br />with revisions to a report intended to <br />serve. with as little burden u possible. <br />as source material for periodic reports to <br />the Congress on the principal activities <br />conducted under the Uniform Act. The <br />report format and timing remain <br />unchanged. - <br />Section 24.10 Appeals <br />Section 24.10(b) Actions which may <br />be appealed Several comments were <br />received an this section. The principal <br />concern was that the appeal process <br />seemed to extend to the question of just <br />compensation. There are well <br />established procedures in place in every <br />State, and in the Federal government. to <br />handle disagreements involving just <br />compensation. These procedures <br />typically begin with the offer of just <br />compensation and conclude. where <br />necessary, with litigation. <br />What is appealable is found in the <br />Uniform Act and the regulation where <br />they refer to the aggrieved person's <br />"application." This refers to the <br />application for the benefits of the <br />Uniform Act. The intent of the Act and <br />the regulation is to requite that there be <br />a procedure for appeals concerning the <br />benefits or eligibility conferred by the <br />Uniform Act This provides an <br />administrative remedy for persons <br />aggrieved by an agency determination <br />as to his or her benefits or eligibility.. <br />Normally this procedure would have to <br />be completed before such person could <br />seek judicial review. <br />Section 2L10(c) Time limit for <br />initiating oppeal. Two commenters <br />suggested extending the tithe limit for <br />initiating an appeal. The responsibility <br />for setting the time limit rests with the <br />Agency subject only to the constraint <br />that Boot be less.thaa 00 days after the <br />person recelvea written notification of <br />