Laserfiche WebLink
Federal Iasi <br />the Agency's determination regarding <br />the person's a <br />ter / VoL 54, No.40 / Thursday, March 2 1989 / Rules and <br />,Regulations <br />pp cation or claim. <br />Section ztro(h) Agency official to <br />review appeal. Several comments were <br />received about agency appeal processes. <br />the levels of review, and the official <br />conducting the review. whether from the m <br />agency or another appropriate hearing c <br />officer. S <br />The appeal process fa an entirely a <br />internal process of an agency. The <br />decisions by the agency about the <br />process must only conform to these <br />regulations and whatever other th <br />administrative rules which the agency <br />must fo{Iow. However, u stated in the " <br />rule, mender must advise the person of a <br />his or her right to seek judicial review <br />after the administrative heating the <br />pure is exhausted. <br />FHWA considered the comments. e <br />electeda to retain 12,4.10 as this <br />written. b <br />Subpart B --Real Property Acquisition Ad <br />pro <br />federally -assisted projects, is <br />applicability "to thegreotest ext <br />practicable under State law" (em <br />supplied). which is the same wo <br />that found in section 305(e) of the <br />Uniform Act. FHWA interprets this <br />can an agency mast comply If <br />ompliance is legally possible and <br />tate law. This should be taken in <br />ccount in an agency's assurances <br />ursuant to 24.4(a). <br />Utility companies as acquiring <br />ggenciea..When the Congress am <br />e Uniform Act, 1t changed the <br />delnitioa of "State agency" to inn <br />any person who has the authority <br />squire property by eminent dam <br />under State law." Utility compantea <br />moat common example of non - <br />=mental entitled which are gran <br />minent domain authority. The eff was, for the first time, <br />ring utility comp/flea under Unit, <br />ent <br />phasic <br />Ming as <br />to <br />er <br />to <br />n <br />ended C <br />ude to <br />to P <br />ain <br />are <br />ted <br />i act of me <br />to <br />rm heliar <br />defined at 24.2(1). If Federal <br />involvement is solely the guarantee arantee of t <br />loan from non -Federal sources, for <br />example. the Uniform Act Is not <br />applicable. <br />If an individual acquisition glee <br />as a voluntary transaction under <br />124.101(aj(i), Subpart B requirements <br />do not apply. This may he important for <br />on-site specific acquisitions. <br />It was elated in a comment that a <br />ondition of membership in a <br />cooperative may include an obligation <br />revisionbute power line rights-of-way. ,, y,, <br />been added in <br />24.104a)(g) to provide that Subpart 8 <br />requirements do not apply if the <br />contribution of reel perly to a <br />al <br />Section 24101 Applicability of <br />Acquisition Requirements or <br />Section 24.101(0). 'There were a large re <br />of comments on this recti �° <br />through their asaocfations, cooperati <br />coverage for certain et their <br />jests. <br />made by a member to <br />the requirements of atemberahip <br />agreements, contracts or bylaws. FHWA <br />es that such cases, where <br />members of cooperatives have agreed to <br />as <br />vide real property to the cooperative <br />by interest of the members. are likelier common <br />untieY transactions rather than to <br />ver. tion. or federally funded <br />3. This regulation <br />lace <br />the State <br />eminent domain law and r <br />operate. <br />ActReellyrBoth section 30S of the uniform <br />dear that the ) of this part maim It <br />uisition <br />ant policies in lith ID Actroperty andSubpart B of this part era applicable "to <br />the greatest extent ctica6�a <br />Sixteen comments were submitted <br />on behalf of utility nles. <br />y I s of Individual entities <br />number <br />on <br />which addresses the applicability of <br />necessary to advance the co <br />presenting e views an concerns of vol <br />Subpart 8 and Title III of the Uniform <br />Cct. Most of the crtmmen <br />areers with limited scopet ed a ofrural <br />and law tea. Almost all of these <br />lithe <br />sible � <br />cooperatives that may <br />Federal the RUM! Electrification <br />stance <br />dAmiinlstratfoe (REA) In the Departm <br />This section of griculture � preamble is <br />ted to the comments and concerns <br />of those entities. FHWA believes that <br />Nance with the Uniform Ad and <br />e regulations will not be as <br />ome as some of the comment <br />it to be. In addition, as <br />sed further below. one suggeati <br />ting from coverage certain <br />actions between cooperatives <br />members, has been adopted. <br />1 wing are the to the comments, with <br />tian FHWA <br />he rule should be amended so ft <br />not_ apply to electric cooperati <br />7 FHWA does not have author' <br />empt any entity or group of entities <br />compliance. However. as described <br />detail later. the regulations <br />intend <br />ro„ vide much latitude and <br />be on shed. particular objective <br />appearthat all of our <br />m�cqulsllions are covered by <br />Rep <br />. 'There are certain candid <br />net be present before a utility <br />Inert m� with Subpart I! <br />Wrennd. kaportandy.financial a �� <br />.��. es u <br />application. and several requested that <br />i Athe ppendix enndix A untary transaction <br />triterla fogad A <br />interim final rule be included. <br />FHWA ber �� 1987 A <br />FHWA has substantially revised this of <br />section based on the comment*. <br />Voluntary transaction criteria hart b devo <br />included, and a provision has been <br />added exempting from coverage certain comp <br />- <br />les <br />real co <br />cooperatives and their member& The <br />perce <br />presence of Federal financial assistance dblire <br />is the basic determinant for <br />applicability, with exceptions provided stamp <br />for those acquisitions Nsted'intrans <br />§ 24.101(a)(1)•.(4), their <br />Eminent domain authority is nota raiseFod <br />determining factor by itself, although reply. <br />any acquisition made under the threat of 1. <br />eminent donteln is cleanly subject to would <br />Subpart B requirements because such an <br />Rep <br />acquisition cannot be a voluntary 1 <br />transaction. <br />from <br />Essential to the voluntary transaction in some <br />process is the requirement that the in <br />owner must be informed In snideg that <br />the property will not be acquired odes may <br />amicable agreement can be reached. L It <br />would <br />ars <br />on. <br />and <br />issues <br />vas. <br />ty <br />However, even though ,W acquisition projects <br />��tion, agencies <br />as a may <br />choose <br />ep <br />fallow theSSubpart 13 3e ss. m Re -"lye <br />Sectriaa 2&Wt (n.1 an Certaint se <br />clarifications have b.�.�...d._ these <br />company <br />sections. The M le.. g ci. mum be <br />State law". This means at while er <br />compliance <br />ce is requfr+ed Mit is not <br />by State law, these <br />provisions do not supersede or overrule <br />any State law regnta. <br />Accordingly. utility companies must <br />continuwith the <br />requirements comply State <br />ch <br />law. Section 24. is part domain <br />scft <br />addressee the assurancess <br />that must be submitted compliance one <br />time action) b the Federal asencypy a one- <br />thee <br />assistanc& Section <br />of <br />exceptions to Subpart B matter fc <br />ns <br />because of provisions of Slaw <br />A utility company may wish to <br />contact the highway icy in its State <br />for assistance in preparing its <br />assurances is thou situation' where the <br />same State eminent domain taw apples <br />to both the higbwa, agency sad the <br />company. The State highway <br />should know whether the <br />ureases <br />because of Stab law. to be <br />unthustend <br />e to en epi report jj and <br />ambit** old Wormed= listed <br />utility <br />Meng' <br />ass <br />gm red <br />4.W <br />