Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Beck, the Wastewater Deputy Chief, was there but did not answer any of the questions, <br />which left Director Kucharski to fill in on what happened in the past. Everyone in the <br />community had an opportunity to reconnect on this issue, and different groups of people <br />who do not associate with each other were uniformly skeptical of the project. Some who <br />did not come to earlier meetings had new grievances that were previously not considered. <br />Mr. Kucharski continues to tell homeowners they must close their cesspools by 2050 and <br />that a sewer line will run down the street for them to connect. This has people upset. <br />There are life-long residents who resist this plan. <br /> <br /> Regarding abandoned vehicles, in Nāālehu a police officer will not initiate an ʻ <br />abandoned vehicle removal procedure, and neither will the county roads people. These <br />departments turn a blind eye on the most obvious vehicles, even those that have become <br />storage units and sleeping quarters for homeless people. Citizens must suffer in silence or <br />risk retaliation from squatters. <br /> <br /> Sandra Demoruelle: The Nāālehu Wastewater Treatment Plant is not necessary. ʻ <br />The county came down and once again told the community that their well is failing and the <br />LCC could not be used as septic system. There is no overflow, and there is nothing wrong <br />with the well. The county was originally going to put septic tanks in the area, and they <br />would run to the current well. However, Director Kucharski keeps maintaining that the <br />well is failing, cannot be reused, and a $40 million system needs to be built. It was nothing <br />but a political ploy to begin with, and it is based on lies. Her group will be talking to a <br />lawyer, because the county refuses to do an EIS. There is no need for the wastewater <br />treatment plant. Everyone would be happy with the septic system they were promised and <br />given an FEA on. It could be done tomorrow. There is no need to do an EIS and there is no <br />need to do anything. <br /> <br /> Steve Holmes: He was a member of the Honolulu City Council, though he is <br />originally from the Big Island. He has been a park ranger and geologist for Hawaiʻi <br />Volcanoes. For most of his years on the Council, he was chair of the Public Works <br />Committee and looked at a lot of wastewater, water, and solid waste issues. He has <br />sympathy for Hawaiʻi County’s challenges. <br /> <br /> His background was in energy. He worked for the U.S. Department of Energy and <br />was the Energy and Sustainability Coordinator for Honolulu. He also worked for the Harris <br />administration as an executive administrative official, where he also dealt with wastewater <br />issues. <br /> <br /> He read the draft EIS for the Kealakehe upgrade and finds himself in an awkward <br />position. For years he has been an advocate for a higher level treatment of wastewater. <br />However, he is concerned that the plan is fatally flawed because of segmentation of a <br />portion of the recycling. Some elements are included in the plan, and some are not. <br />Another fatal flaw is that right now the effluent is very salty, and Kona’s drinking water is <br />also very salty. It exceeds the EPA secondary treatment standards by several times, which <br />is very frustrating for him as an environmentalist. He pays water bills and expects to have <br />drinking water supplied to him, but he ends up instead buying bottled water from Costco. <br /> <br /> <br />