2019-03-07 Hearing Transcript - Wailani Development, LLC Amend REZ 10-117

Home

CLARKSON: I don't know how we're going to proceed with discussing all of these numerous potential amendments. I have questions about a number of them. Perhaps we should just go through them one at a time and have questions from the Commission and discussion by the Commission for each individual amendment, and when we get to the amendments that relate to underground utilities, relate to connectivity, relate to the Director's discretion to redesign the entire project according to his whims, we can talk about it then. JACKSON: Okay. So, the only request that I would have is if you have specific questions about the Applicant's most recent request for revising Conditions R and P that you ask those of the Applicant. Okay. IKEDA: I wanted to ask. I didn't quite understand. My interpretation of what I read and now the amendments and everything else and the Director's unfavorable recommendation got me concerned so could you explain the two Condition P, Q, and R. That's the three I have problem on. Also, I don't support two things, and I can you right off the bat, it's Condition D I don't support. JACKSON: Condition B or D? IKEDA: D. JACKSON: D. IKEDA: And, ConditionI don't support the Director's recommendation of deleting Condition S. But, could you go over the Condition P, Q, and R, because I was going over and over last night, and I get kind of confused. JACKSON: Okay. Are you okay if I go over the Applicant's most recent request to IKEDA: Yes JACKSON: —Okay, things have evolved, yeah? IKEDA: I kind of agree with his suggestion but it seems like when I read it, it seems like there's an overkill on the Planning Director's Recommendation, for unfavorable recommendation. JACKSON: And, is that related to one of those three conditions or all of them? IKEDA: All of them. JACKSON: Okay, all right. Let me start with Condition P. Okay. So, for Condition P, as I mentioned, the original requirement on Wailani in their 2010 ordinance was to construct the Ponahawai Street Extension and dedicate it to the County at no cost, and that construction was supposed to include construction within an 80 -foot right-of-way to County dedicable standards along with curb, gutter, and sidewalk. And, that construction was supposed to start within five EXHIBIT C