My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019-03-05 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Kailua Village Design Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2024
>
2019
>
2019-03-05 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/11/2019 8:59:38 AM
Creation date
4/11/2019 8:59:35 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
be too small on the canopy that would be 21 feet high on a 20-foot rise off the roadway. Asked <br />by Commissioner Van Pernis, Commissioner Sullenberger suggested 18 inches. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Pernis amended his motion to state that height of the logo and the lettering be <br />18 inches and twelve inches, respectively. <br /> <br /> Typical Tenant Sign <br /> <br />Chairman Roth summarized that more details were submitted; however, the plan would still <br />allow the tenants to use their fonts and colors without the Commission review. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hetherington asked whether the background design was a generic concept where <br />each tenant would be able to choose their own color and motif. Mr. Vierra responded that the <br />color and the motif would be standard, and that the proposal was to give the tenants an allowable <br />range of size with a maximum height of 18 inches. Also in response to Commissioner <br />Hetherington’s question, he said that the color of the background was not determined yet, and <br />that it would be selected from the approved building color palette of browns and beiges so that it <br />would not stand out in high contrast. <br /> <br />Upon inquiry by Commissioner Van Pernis, Mr. Vierra clarified that the particular red and white <br />color samples on Sheet T-2 were for Safeway signs; however, their proposal was that their <br />tenants be able to use their brand colors, which might include reds and whites. Ms. Schatz added <br />that those individual brand colors would be allowed only within the designated sign area, and <br />that the background would be kept the same for all tenant signs in a color from the approved <br />color palette for the buildings. Commissioner Van Pernis said that he wanted to confirm that the <br />tenants would not be allowed to use the red and the white, even though they were provided in the <br />plan, unless their brand colors were as such. Ms. Schatz reiterated that reds and whites would <br />not be used outside of their brand because those were not in the approved color palette. <br /> <br />Chairman Roth noted that the tenants would not have to come in for the Commission review as <br />long as they followed these proposed guidelines. He questioned whether the Commission would <br />want to allow that much flexibility. He added that he generally liked the master plan concept for <br />consistency; however, in this case, because fonts and colors were not defined, the Commission <br />would be giving up its oversight in that aspect. Commissioner Kern commented that she liked <br />the proposed concept where all tenant signs would be framed the same way with the design <br />element, which might soften the mixed look of different logos and colors. Commissioner <br />Hetherington agreed, but expressed his concern about allowing as many as 20 stores to use <br />whatever colors. He suggested that Commission’s approval be only for the design concept and <br />not for individual signs. <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Sullenberger’s question about the proposed size and height <br />restrictions, Mr. Vierra said that some logos might come in a stack design rather than a lineal <br />design, in which case there could be two lines of nine-inch high lettering. Commissioner <br />Sullenberger pointed out that the current proposal would allow the signs to be at varied heights <br />within 18 inches, as well as different lengths. He said that he would like to see uniformity in size <br />of the background throughout the project by specifying not only the height but also the length, <br />which could be determined based on the 18-inch total height and the 22-square foot designated <br />9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.