Laserfiche WebLink
16 FEB OS <br /> To: Hawaii County Council <br /> From: Roy K. Skogstrom <br /> Pepeekeo, HI <br /> Re Written testimony in support of proposed Continental Pacific SMAs <br /> Deaz Council Members: <br /> This letter is to provide written testimony in favor of the Continental Pacific (CP) SMAs that you <br /> will be considering at your meeting of Wednesday 16 FEB O5. This same written testimony was <br /> given previously to the Hawaii County Council Planning Committee. <br /> My wife and I aze the only long-term residents of the Pepeekeo Point area where the CP <br /> development is taking place (there have been three occupied houses in the azea, but two are <br /> rentals). We have lived there about twelve years and have greatly enjoyed the largely <br /> uninhabited nature of the azea. Now we are surrounded by the CP development. Therefore I <br /> believe we are the last people on the island who wanted this development. <br /> Nonetheless, we are testifying in favor the proposed SMAs for the following reasons: <br /> 1) The CP development, and the SMAs in particular, were the result of extensive <br /> negotiation between CP and Planning Director Chris Yuen. We have considerable faith <br /> in Mr. Yuen's desire to preserve the nature of the Hamakua coast environment and <br /> lifestyle, and shoreline access, as best as possible, while recognizing that some <br /> development is inevitable. We believe that in this case he has done well in that regard, in <br /> that the number of parcels is fewer, and the number of shoreline accesses greater, than <br /> might otherwise have been the case. Also, the SMAs appear to be adown-zoning. <br /> 2) Both the Pepeekeo Community Association (PCA) and its Fishing Access Committee <br /> (which helped a great deal to negotiate the shoreline accesses) have cited CP in writing as <br /> a model of developer cooperation with the community. We agree with this assessment. <br /> There have been numerous community meetings over several yeazs to arrive at the result <br /> before you, and the PCA has recommended your approval of the SMAs. <br /> 3) CP has agreed to donate to the PCA $15,000 from the sale of each of the 22 SMA <br /> parcels, totaling $330,000, plus substantial grading and grubbing work valued at perhaps <br /> another $400,000, to improve the Pepeekeo community recreational facilities. <br /> 4) We fear that if these SMAs do not go through, that the next developer may not be so <br /> community-friendly, and the down-zoning and shoreline accesses may be diminished. <br /> Mahalo for your consideration - <br /> <br /> . <br /> Roy K. Skogstrom <br /> Comm. No. 1 s• 3 <br /> Ref. To: ~'?e~eMM <br /> Ref. mate <br /> <br />