My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0526.012 2010-2012
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2010-2012
>
COM 0526.012 2010-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2021 12:57:05 PM
Creation date
8/24/2012 9:11:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2010-2012
Communication
0526
Point
012
Author
Graham Wood
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
REP PC 063 07/31/2012 2010-2012
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2010-2012\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 1 of 3 <br /> Pht <br /> Murashige, Laura COM kl 62b <br /> From: Graham Wood [graham@lehuaorchids.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 3:57 PM <br /> To: counciltestimony@co.hawaii.hi.us <br /> Cc: jiyo@co.hawaii.hi.us <br /> Subject: Bill 168 <br /> - , <br /> here is a cut and paste of two comments i sent earlier that apparently did-, <br /> not make it into the council records. i have added a third comment <br /> Jocelyn may i ask you to confirm that these made it this time, please? --- <br /> addition to the two cut and paste comments below i will start with a thir? <br /> comment <br /> Comment #3 <br /> i am shocked that the Planning Department and the Planning Commission <br /> would allow such a development in the "Volcano Heritage Corridor", where <br /> does an auto repair shop in front of an attractive residence on the Volcano <br /> Road fit into this designation? in fact i did discuss this matter with a <br /> member of the Planning Commission who was not aware of the location of the <br /> project. the response i got was that "it was in the village" clearly it is not <br /> and that member voted relying on faulty information <br /> Cut and Paste <br /> Comment #1 sent to council member J Yoshino with a copy to council <br /> ,., .;tirnony, original date Feb 24, 12 <br /> cp'eeting j from a normally quiet constituent of yours who is also a business <br /> owner in your district, at least the last time i knew about the districts we <br /> were in yours. i guess we won't really know until the next election, that <br /> stuff is too confusing <br /> one thing that is not confusing however is my horror at learning that the <br /> council is wasting its time on this rezoning issue, why was this not simply <br /> denied at the planning department or commission level? <br /> i have just learned about what is being requested and am amazed that there <br /> would be any such consideration, if approved this will simply put a <br /> commercial development in as part of a very nice addition to our residential <br /> Comm. No. S-2-42• <br /> Ref.To: <br /> Ref. Date <br /> 7/30/2012 jui 01! <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.