My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-04-01 PL-SPP-2024-000062 Mamolani King Opposition Testimony
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-04-04 Windward
>
#2 Tirtha Luitel (PL-SPP-2024-000062) - Deferred per Applicant Request on 03-21-2024
>
2024-04-01 PL-SPP-2024-000062 Mamolani King Opposition Testimony
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2024 4:37:54 PM
Creation date
4/1/2024 4:37:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
4/1/2024
Description
Opposition testimony
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
To: Windward Planning Commissioners <br /> c/o Planning Department. <br /> 2 <br /> East Hawaii Office C0H APR 0�'1102 40 01r122 <br /> 2101 Pauahi St. Suite 3 "'"`0``2 <br /> Hilo, Hawaii 96720 <br /> From: Mamolani King RF0'0 H;AN0 0F1"IVERE <br /> P. O. Box 831093 <br /> Pepeekeo, Hawaii 96783 <br /> Re: Special Permit Application <br /> (PL-SPP-2024-000062) <br /> CC: �Lpiptestimonv__cz.Hawaiicounty.gou <br /> irrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr■<br /> Aloha kakou! I am writing to you to express my adamant opposition to <br /> expanding the offensive, unsightly cement eyesore with storage trailer, water tank, <br /> porta-potties and a food trailer on TMK(3) 2-8-010:014 next to Akaka Falls State <br /> Park. Many of my friends in the neighborhood and acquaintances from the greater <br /> East Hawaii community are also opposed to the expansion and commercialization <br /> of this parking area and "restaurant". <br /> The Special Permit application, PL-SPP-2024-000062 being considered by <br /> you, the Windward Planning Commission, is misleading in many, many ways. The <br /> project is far from being low impact as it is claimed in the application. Nor would <br /> it "retain the essential character of the land". <br /> First, on Page 4, lines 7-8 of the special permit application references an <br /> 11,500 square foot concrete pad already developed on the property. (This is part of <br /> the eyesore mentioned in paragraph one above.) Question: How was this cement <br /> pad constructed on state agricultural zoned property to begin with? To repeat <br /> throughout the application that the soil within the special permit area is "C" (fair) <br /> or "D" (poor) is highly misleading. According to a map included in the application, <br /> the sail is rated C. The MRCS (US Department of Agriculture Natural Resourrce <br /> Conservation Service considers "prime farmland". I myself farm on soil type "C" <br /> with amazing productivity despite no additional inputs such as commercial <br /> fertilizer. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.