Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />COUNTY OF HAWAII <br />HEARING TRANSCRIPT <br />February 15, 2007 <br />MICHAEL MARTINAGE/GREG NUNN <br />A regularly advertised hearing on the application of <br />(SPP 06-000039) <br />was called to order at 1:55 p.m. at the King Kamehameha's Kona Beach Hotel, <br />75-5660 Palani Road, Kailua-Kona, Hawaii, with Chairman William Graham presiding. <br />PRESENT: C. Kimo Alameda (left at 2:20) ABSENT & EXCUSED: Jeffrey McCall <br /> Fred Galdones Rene’ Siracusa <br /> William Graham <br /> Andrew Iwashita <br />Alvin Rho <br /> Rodney Watanabe <br />Ivan Torigoe, Deputy Corporation Counsel <br />Christopher Yuen, Planning Director <br />Norman Hayashi, Planning Program Manager <br />OgxkkhrEtihlnsn+Rs`eeOk`mmdq <br />Jeff Darrow, Staff Planner <br />Michael Martinage, Applicant <br />Greg Nunn, Applicant <br />Klaus Conventz representing Applicants <br />Aq`cE`qvdkk+Hmsdqudmnq <br />And approximately 6 people from the public in attendance. <br />APPLICANTS: MICHAEL MARTINAGE/GREG NUNN (SPP 06-000039) <br />Action on the Special Permit to allow the establishment of a 5-room Bed and Breakfast operation <br />within an existing dwelling and a guest house situated on a 5.06-acre lot in the State Land Use <br />Agricultural District. The property is located along the northeast (mauka) side of Napoopoo <br />Road (82-5990 Napoopoo Road), Waipunaula, South Kona, Hawaii, TMK: 8-2-3:28. <br />GRAHAM: Our first order of business in the afternoon is a Special Permit. Applicants <br />are Michael Martinage/Greg Nunn. This is in the State Land Use Ag District off Napoopoo <br />Road in South Kona. It’s for a five-room bed and breakfast. We did have this Application <br />before us previously. We had a contested case request, and we in fact conducted a contested <br />case hearing right at the time. And we finished the hearing, and my understanding now – after <br />we finished the hearing, we went into a vote amongst the Commission, and we had a split vote <br />and no decision was made – so my understanding at this time is since we finished the contested <br />case hearing, we are sort of picking up again as action time amongst the Commissioners, but <br />since we are on the agenda, we certainly want to take any testimony from the public who’s here. <br />Does that sound correct to everybody? So I have a – we did take testimony at our last meeting – <br />I do have five people signed up today, and I’m only asking that it’s probably beneficial for us if <br />you keep your testimony kind of short to the point, so we can move along with this agenda item. <br />EXHIBIT D <br />1 <br /> <br />