My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
RES 047 Draft 01 2020-2022
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Resolutions
>
2020-2022
>
RES 047 Draft 01 2020-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2021 12:04:32 PM
Creation date
2/11/2021 9:55:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Bill/Resolution
Bill/Resolution - Type
RES
Bill/Resolution - Council Term
2020-2022
Bill/Resolution
047
Draft
01
Introducer
Holeka Goro Inaba, Council Member
Referred To
PRPSC
Action 1
PRPSC-14: Recommended Adoption - 3/2/21
Action 2
Council: Adopts Res. 47-21 & PRPSC-14 - 3/17/21
Status
Adopted
Date To Mayor or Adoption Date
3/17/2021
Reading Number
1
Reading Date
3/17/2021
Ayes
8-Chung, Inaba, Kaneali'i-Kleinfelder, Kierkiewicz, Kimball, Lee Loy, Richards, Villegas
Noes
0
Absent
1-David
Excused
0
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2021-03-17 2020-2022
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Council
AGE PRPSC 2021/03/02 (2020-2022)
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Parks and Recreation and Public Safety Committee (PRPSC)
COM 0119.000 2020-2022
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2020-2022
REP PRPSC 014 2021/03/02 2020-2022
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2020-2022\Parks and Recreation and Public Safety Committee (PRPSC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
c) Ridership surveys; and <br />f) Operator surveys. <br />Factor 3: Determine the Importance to LEP Persons of Your Program Activities and <br />Services. <br />Generally speaking, the more important the program, the more frequent the contact and the <br />likelihood that language services will be needed. The provision of public transportation is a vital <br />service, especially for people without access to personal vehicles. 5310 regional planning <br />activities will impact every person in a region. Development of a coordinated plan to meet the <br />specific transportation needs of seniors and people with disabilities will often also meet the needs <br />of LEP persons. A person who is LEP may have a disability that prevents the person from using <br />fixed route service, thus making the person eligible for ADA complementary paratransit. Transit <br />providers, States, and 5 3 1 Os must assess their programs, activities and services to ensure they are <br />providing meaningful access to LEP persons. Facilitated meetings with LEP persons are one <br />method to inform the recipient on what the local LEP population considers to be an essential <br />service, as well as the most effective means to provide language assistance. <br />Factor 4: Determine the Resource Available to the Recipient and Costs. <br />Resource and cost issues can often be reduced by technological advances, reasonable business <br />practices, and the sharing of language assistance materials and services among and between <br />recipients, advocacy groups, LEP populations and Federal agencies. Large entities and those <br />entities serving a significant number of LEP persons should ensure that their resource limitations <br />are well substantiated before using this factor as a reason to limit language assistance. <br />Developing a Language Assistance Plan. <br />After completing the Four Factor Analysis, the recipient shall use the results of the analyses to <br />determine which language assistance services are appropriate. Additionally, the recipient shall <br />develop an assistance plan to address the identified needs of the LEP population(s) it serves. <br />USDOT's LEP Guidance recognizes that certain recipients, such as those serving very few LEP <br />persons or those with very limited resources, may choose not to develop a written plan. <br />However, FTA has determined it is necessary to require its recipients to develop an assistance <br />plan in order to ensure compliance. A recipient may formally request an exemption from this <br />requirement if it believes it fits within the exception described. <br />Recipients have considerable flexibility in developing a Language Assistance Plan, or LEP Plan. <br />An LEP Plan shall, at a minimum: <br />a) Include the results of the Four Factor Analysis, including a description of the LEP <br />population(s) served; <br />b) Describe how the recipient provides language assistance services by language; <br />c) Describe how the recipient provides notice to LEP persons about the availability of <br />language assistance; <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.