Laserfiche WebLink
Accordingly, it may be unlikely that the site would be developed more <br /> intensively for residential uses. <br /> . Alternative Residential Densities <br /> The site could be developed into a higher residential density, <br /> such as multiple-family. However, that would not be fulfilling the <br /> long-range lradostr'ial objective of the General Plan LUPAG map. <br /> Notwithstanding the General Plan, as noted above, having residential <br /> uses adjacent to a major street; particularly from a noise and dust <br /> perspective, may not be a desirable use. <br /> 4. Evaluation sof Alternatives <br /> Leaving the property in its current undeveloped state would not <br /> rnaximize the use of the land. There would also be diminished tax <br /> revenues and fewer services to the public. <br /> Vlhile alternative residential densities are possible, the proximity of <br /> industrial and commercial uses and a major highway would not make <br /> such a project feasible. <br /> At the same time, the project's impact to the area's social and <br /> physical infrastructure would not appear to be pronounced, <br /> particularly considering the quasi-residential scale and design of the <br /> building. Further, additional mitigative measures such as <br /> landscaping, lighting, and so forth will be taken to address any <br /> possible impact associated with the proposed use. <br /> In that regard, the project in totality would be consistent with the land <br /> use objectives sought to be accomplished by the County General <br /> Phan LUPAG reap. <br /> In view of the aforementioned, none of the alternatives would be more <br /> prudent and beneficial than the requested MMX--20 zoning alternative. <br /> IX. REGULATORY ANALYSIS <br /> A. general Plan LUPAG app <br /> The General Plan provides for the long-range comprehensive <br /> development of the island of Hawaii, It provides direction for balanced <br /> growth in the County. <br /> 14 <br />