My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0596.001 2020-2022
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2020-2022
>
COM 0596.001 2020-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2022 3:36:54 PM
Creation date
2/1/2022 3:04:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2020-2022
Communication
596
Point
001
Author
Zendo Kern, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 2022/02/08 (2020-2022)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The next image exhibit Christian,thank you. So, this is looking directly at the subject property <br /> from basically the Pahoa side of Highway 130. You may note that Highway 132 is off to your <br /> left and Highway 130 continues to run off to the right. And you see where the gentleman is <br /> walking through the along the crosswalk. The crosswalks along both highways basically point <br /> toward the subject property and that is where you'd like to assume where pedestrian movement <br /> will concentrate, and then should this rezoning be approved, the commercial would be the only <br /> pedestrian attraction on this side of Highway 130. So, it does make sense to provide as much <br /> pedestrian accommodation within the subject property rather than trying to relocate or create a <br /> new pedestrian facility along Highway 132 because beyond the subject property there is no real <br /> attractive use like say additional commercial zoned lands beyond the subject property. <br /> FUKE: Excuse me Daryn. Daryn,before you move on to the next slide. What I kind of wanted <br /> to point out to the Commission is by looking at this is that you can see where all the utility poles <br /> are. To have the curb, gutters and sidewalk in that particular area would amount to having those <br /> poles kind of relocated at considerable cost and we're going to show you what the options are in <br /> in the subsequent exhibits by leaving the poles as is, and you can still accomplish that so. I'm <br /> sorry, go ahead Daryn. <br /> ARAI: Oh, no, no, thank you, thank you, I appreciate that and then, if you go to Exhibit D. <br /> Christian showed you this in his very thorough and comprehensive presentation and the red <br /> outlines the location of the proposed 8-foot pedestrian path within the subject property. That <br /> would basically utilize the existing paved area that the applicant will have to provide in order to <br /> support the proposed commercial development. So, again whether it's within Highway 132 or <br /> within the subject property, it will accomplish the same purpose, especially with the proposed <br /> amendments that we have recommended to Condition K and, finally, the last exhibit Christian. <br /> And this photograph it's just a representative of what we are trying to explain or convey through <br /> the diagrams where you have Highway 132 being shown by the travel way or the roadway off to <br /> your left of the image. The current shoulder fronting the subject property along Highway 132 <br /> being represented by the grass shoulders here. And the onsite 8-foot pedestrian pathway being <br /> considered or propose being represented by the asphalt sidewalk located to the right side of this <br /> particular image. <br /> So again, as you can see the curb, gutters and sidewalk improvements being recommended by <br /> the Planning Department would normally be constructed right up against the improved travel <br /> way. When the same functionality can be accomplished by an internal pathway as demonstrated <br /> here in this particular photo. So, with that being said, we hope that we have presented a <br /> reasonable argument on why we feel that the 8-foot pathway will ensure that public health, <br /> safety, and welfare as well as any different or deleterious effects upon public facilities will not be <br /> impacted by this proposed commercial rezoning. So, with that we stand ready to answer any <br /> questions that you may have. <br /> AU: Thank you, Mr. Arai, thank you Mr. Fuke. Any questions for the applicant? <br /> Commissioner Galimba, <br /> ou had your hand raised first. <br /> Y <br /> GALIMBA: Thank you, so in that last picture that you showed us. There's also a drainage ditch <br /> built into the solution there and I thought that's part of the curb, gutterrecommendation it's also <br /> 9 <br /> EXHIBIT C (DRAFT) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.