My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0596.001 2020-2022
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2020-2022
>
COM 0596.001 2020-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2022 3:36:54 PM
Creation date
2/1/2022 3:04:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2020-2022
Communication
596
Point
001
Author
Zendo Kern, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 2022/02/08 (2020-2022)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a drainage element. So, I'm wondering if there's a drainage element to your proposed solution <br /> or how you might be wanting to address drainage issues that might arise from the development. <br /> Thanks. <br /> FUKE: I can respond to that. That photograph is taken from so called what I would consider <br /> like the Waimea Bypass Road right near where the Parker Ranch headquarters is, so it's in that <br /> section. So, when they constructed that road, they had gotten some exceptions from the standard <br /> curb, gutter, and sidewalk requirement because they wanted to have the ambience more like in <br /> keeping with area. So, they had to address specifically the drainage question, so what you just <br /> seen, what you saw in that photo is of course like a swell, a drainage swell. In this particular <br /> situation and that's why I kind of wanted to point out to the existing situation where there would <br /> not be any improvements to the highway portion so, understandably, they would not be any need <br /> to have added drainage improvements in that area. The concept was to have like the walkway <br /> being incorporated all within the applicant's property. So essentially no new improvements to <br /> the roadway section just visualize like you're going to have like an 8-foot-wide path constructed <br /> and that would accomplish the same thing as what you saw in the Parker Ranch situation, the <br /> Waimea situation. <br /> ARAI: Sorry, I should note that if the pathway is within the applicant's property there's also part <br /> of the proposed parking lot and driveway within the commercial development. County normally <br /> will require drainage improvements within the subject property in order to prevent any drainage <br /> flows from going to adjoining properties or onto the roadway. <br /> FUKE: Yeah,related to that is that is part of the Plan Approval requirement,before the property <br /> can actually be occupied. You need to have a site drainage plan that's approved by the <br /> Department of Public Works. The site drainage plan has to address all of the existing as well as <br /> proposed improvements on the property and they have to be implemented in conjunction with the <br /> development or improvement of the land. <br /> AU: Sony to interrupt, but I do see a representative from the Department of Public Works. Ms. <br /> Matsumoto would you like speak, I would have to swear you in though. So, sorry <br /> Commissioners, can we hear Ms. Matsumoto first before you move on with your question so, can <br /> you please raise your right hand. Do you affirm to tell the truth in front of the Windward <br /> Planning Commission today? <br /> MATSUMOTO: Ido. <br /> AU: Okay, thank you very much, so I guess my question to you is, can you please address Mr. <br /> Fuke and Mr. Arai's request to amend Condition K. <br /> MATSUMOTO: So, basically, that curb, gutter, and sidewalk that's a standard comment based <br /> on the commercial Change of Zone. This is the same comment we made for when they applied <br /> back in 2012 and withdrew that application. It was also included on the Use permit so we're <br /> sticking with the same comment, and nothing has changed. Regarding the proposed alternate <br /> that they're recommending that's a little bit different because, I think it's Ala `®hi`a. That one <br /> the County is maintaining based on a grant of easement but within the Waimea subdivision the <br /> 10 <br /> EXHIBIT C (DRAFT) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.