My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0952.001 2022-2022
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2020-2022
>
COM 0952.001 2022-2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2022 1:06:21 PM
Creation date
8/29/2022 1:20:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2020-2022
Communication
0952
Point
001
Author
Zendo Kern, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 2022/09/06 (2020-2022)
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
AGE PC 2022/10/18 (2020-2022)
(Original Version)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2020-2022\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Again, in the past when we were talking about what happened at Committee, they were <br /> trying to impose the condition for them to do all the improvements. It was a project killer, <br /> basically. And this is one fourth the amount of lots. <br /> KNOWLES: And Mr. Pipan, it sounds like from your most recent correspondence to the <br /> Commission that this, even this revised requirement or condition to the permit is <br /> prohibitive for you. Is that true, or you're fine with it? Because it requires collaboration <br /> with the unknown owners of the neighboring parcel. <br /> PIPAN: No the, the revised condition is basically what we suggested— <br /> KNOWLES: Okay, sorry. <br /> PIPAN: --to, to alleviate that concern with compelling action. Thank you. <br /> DARROW: Mr. Chairman? <br /> • <br /> VITOUSEK: Yes. <br /> DARROW: Just really briefly, there was discussion about the property to the south. In <br /> looking at the aerial there appears to be some structures along Hualalai on that property, <br /> but maybe development wasn't the correct word. The word we were looking for is <br /> something like a rezoning where if they came in to create higher density and there were <br /> conditions placed on that property, we could provide the connection to the adjoining <br /> subdivision and create connectivity. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay. Now back to the fact-finding on the, the sewer. Have you actually <br /> received estimates for what it would cost for putting the sewer only within your portion? <br /> PIPAN: Yes, thanks-- <br /> VITOUSEK: What would that be. <br /> PIPAN: We reached out to Engineering Partners for estimates and obviously, a lot of it's <br /> going to depend on the exact design, the depth that the sewers have to be dug down to. <br /> I'm assuming we're going to hit some rock here. So, their ballpark estimate, cost per <br /> range. if we'rehaving <br /> linear foot was somewhere in the $250 to $400 per linear foot So, av g <br /> to put in,probably not 1,000 feet, but you can see how that adds up pretty quickly to <br /> hundreds of thousands of dollars. <br /> VITOUSEK: Yep. Yeah, that's about what I would expect. So, do you, how much linear <br /> footage are you looking at on that road there? <br /> 23 <br /> EXHIBIT F <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.