Laserfiche WebLink
steep topography that would make it too difficult to extend the road lot for sake of a <br /> single parcel (see PUD application Figure 3 —PUD Master Plan). <br /> • Minimum Building Site Area; Minimum Average Width (HCC §25-4-31). <br /> Request to waive minimum building site area requirements to allow a minimum <br /> building site area of 10,000 square feet within the proposed RS-15 zoning district. <br /> Additionally, request to allow the minimum building site area average width to be 60 <br /> feet instead of the 75 feet required within the proposed RS-15 zoning district(see <br /> PUD application Figure 3 —PUD Master Plan). <br /> • Reduction of Building Site Below Minimum Area (HCC §25-4-32). Request to <br /> reduce building sites to no less than 10,000 square feet in lieu of the 15,000 square <br /> feet minimum lot size required by the proposed RS-15 zoning district (see PUD <br /> application Figure 3 —PUD Master Plan). <br /> • Minimum Building Site Average Width (HCC §25-5-6). Request to allow the <br /> minimum building site area average width of 60 feet instead of the 75 feet required by <br /> the proposed RS-15 zoning district(see PUD application Figure 3 —PUD Master <br /> Plan). <br /> • Minimum Yards (HCC §25-5-7). Request to allow a minimum front yard setback of <br /> 15 feet in lieu of the 20 feet required by the proposed RS-15 zoning district(see PUD <br /> application Exhibit 1 —Yard Designation). <br /> • Other Regulations (HCC §25-5-8). Request to allow for a minimum front yard <br /> setback of 15 feet for all lots, irrespective of minimum building site average width <br /> of 60 feet that is consistent with an RS-7.5 zoning district. <br /> Exceptions Requested from Subdivision Code (HCC Chapter 23) <br /> • Access to Lot from Street(HCC §23-34). Request to allow for one lot (Village 2, <br /> Lot 5) to not have any direct roadway frontage nor access pole, instead it is proposed <br /> to be accessed via a roadway easement due to steep topography that would make it <br /> too difficult to extend the road lot for the sake of a single parcel. Additionally, the <br /> applicant proposes that the Village 2, Lot 18 pole will also accommodate accesses for <br /> -2- <br />