My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0291.000 2000-2002
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2000-2002
>
COM 0291.000 2000-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 4:41:21 AM
Creation date
5/10/2008 2:30:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2000-2002
Communication
0291
Point
000
Author
Aaron S. Y. Chung, Councilmember Chair, Finance Committee
Communications - Referred To
FC
Comments
FC-104: Recommends adoption of Res. 108-01, as amended to Draft 2 - 08/28/01
Communications - File Code
AUD
Document Relationships
AGE FC 08/28/2001 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2000-2002\Finance Committee (FC)
COM 0291.003 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
REP FC 104 08/28/2001 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2000-2002\Finance Committee (FC)
REP FC 104 08/28/2001 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2000-2002\Finance Committee (FC)
RES 108 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Resolutions\2000-2002
RES 108 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Resolutions\2000-2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1'A~L~ <br /> EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS <br /> INDEPENDENT FINANCIAL AUDIT <br /> Proposals will be awarded a maximum of 200 technical points based upon evaluation of <br /> proposal content. A maximum of 75 additional points will be awarded based upon cost and <br /> <br /> added to the proposal's technical points average. <br /> <br /> Cost Points: The total cost for four years will be awarded the maximum number of points <br /> <br /> assigned to cost. The following formula will be used to assign the cost points for each <br /> <br /> proposal: Price of Lowest Cost Proposal X Maximum Points for Cost (75) = Points <br /> Price of Proposal Being Rated <br /> <br /> Scale: 0-10 (Unacceptable to Outstanding} Maximum Score = 200 <br /> Factor Value X Weight = Score <br /> 1 Previous experience in performing X 3 = <br /> comparable governmental auditing <br /> 2 Demonstrates qualifications to <br /> conduct audit in accordance with the X 3 = <br /> specifications <br /> 3 Allocates sufficient resources to the <br /> audit to meet the timetables set out <br /> in the specifications X 3 = <br /> 4 Demonstrates a clear understanding <br /> of & fully responds to specifications <br /> & instructions X 3 = <br /> 5 Methodology presented evidences <br /> that audit will be conducted in a <br /> systematic and sound manner X 2 = <br /> 6 Adheres to the scope & guidelines <br /> listed in the specifications X 2 = <br /> 7 Demonstrates a commitment to be <br /> accessible during audit & throughout X 2 = <br /> the fiscal year <br /> 8 Quality of writing of the proposal is <br /> indicative of the quality of reports X 2 <br /> Subtotal Score <br /> 9 Cost Points <br /> TOTAL SCORE <br /> -21- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.