My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
REP FC 104 08/28/2001 2000-2002
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Reports
>
2000-2002
>
Finance Committee (FC)
>
REP FC 104 08/28/2001 2000-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 11:04:23 AM
Creation date
5/10/2008 2:32:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Reports
Reports - Type
REP
Reports - Council Term
2000-2002
Report
104
Committee
FC
Meeting date
2001-08-28
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 09/12/2001 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2000-2002\Council
AGE FC 08/28/2001 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2000-2002\Finance Committee (FC)
COM 0291.000 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
COM 0291.000 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2000-2002
RES 108 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Resolutions\2000-2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Your Committee, during its discussion of Resolution No. 108-01, Draft 2, approved the <br /> <br /> following amendments: <br /> Amending the resolved clause to read l . An Evaluation Committee will be <br /> established and [could] may be composed of [a] at least one Council Member appointed <br /> by the Chair, the Legislative Auditor, the Fiscal/Program Review Auditor, a Council <br /> Legislative Assistant, and a representative from the State Auditor's Office...." <br /> <br /> Also during its discussion a revised RFP based on comments from individual Council members <br /> <br /> was requested. <br /> Your Committee questioned whether the amount of experience needed of agencies having to <br /> qualify as an audit firm should be raised from three years to five years of governmental audits <br /> and a budget of $50 million to $100 million. It could not be determined whether raising these <br /> minimum figures would raise the quality of the audit firm. <br /> An amendment was brought forward to reduce the audit contract period from four to two years. <br /> However, that motion was defeated. Although theoretically the Council would have the <br /> opportunity to hire another audit firm with "fresh eyes" every Council term, this does affect the <br /> total cost, the amount of start-up time necessary to understand the county government processes, <br /> and the amount of time spent by administration to assist the audit firm in familiarizing <br /> themselves with the processes. <br /> Several members of Your Committee expressed a desire to conduct performance and efficiency <br /> audits. It was pointed out that these are very different from the narrower financial audit. If the <br /> Council wished to conduct these other reviews, money has been budgeted this fiscal year to <br /> make this happen. <br /> Your Committee on Finance is in accord with the purpose and intent of Resolution No. 108-01, <br /> as amended to Draft 2, and recommends its adoption. <br /> smc <br /> nsES NOES ,4&E Ea Respectfully submitted <br /> CHUNG X <br /> PISICCHIO x COMMITTEE ON FINANCE <br /> ARAKAKI X <br /> ELARIONOFF X <br /> JACOBSON X <br /> LEITHEAD-TODD X <br /> SAFARIK X AARON S.Y. CHUNG, C AIR <br /> TYLER X FC REPORT N~ - 104 ry~ <br /> Y'AGONG X ADOPTED: 1 ~ c.mo <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.