Laserfiche WebLink
The MUTCD lists four primary criteria based on traffic volumes and accident <br />experience to determine whether or not a four way stop is warranted. It also <br />lists four optional criteria based on engineering judgment. A ten hour manual <br />traffic count was taken at the intersection on September 9, 2003, to provide <br />traffic volume data to measure against the warrants. The County provided <br />traffic accident data to measure against the traffic accident experience warrant. <br />A field inspection determined that only one of the four optional warrants <br />pertaining to controlling left turn conflicts could be evaluated. <br />"Before and after" spot speed studies were conducted to determine if any <br />changes in traffic speed on Nani Kailua Drive occurred as a result of the four <br />way stop. The counts were taken on June 26, 2003, about a month before <br />installation, and on August 28, 2003, about a month after installation. <br />The members of the Kona traffic Safety Committee were contacted by email for <br />their opinions at the start and near the completion of the study. <br />Results of the Evaluation. The results for the three sets of criteria are <br />discussed in the following paragraphs. <br />With respect to the warrants listed in the MUTCD, none of the two primary <br />traffic volume -related and traffic accident -related warrants are met. There are <br />not enough vehicles at the intersection to warrant either traffic signals or a four <br />way stop. There are also not sufficient numbers of vehicles to cause left turn <br />conflicts; therefore, the one optional criterion is not met. <br />With respect to speed changes effected by the four way stop, the following table <br />summarizes the "before and after" results: <br />Number of samples <br />Average speed (mph) <br />Minimum speed (mph) <br />Maximum speed (mph) <br /><20 mph <br />20-30 mph <br />31-35 mph <br />>35 mph <br />DOWNHILL RESULTS <br />BEFORE AFTER <br />229 <br />185 <br />32.6 <br />28.8 <br />9 <br />16 <br />55 <br />57 <br />4(2%) <br />5(3%) <br />89(39%) <br />116(63%) <br />72(31%) <br />44(24%) <br />64(28%) <br />20(11%) <br />UPHILL RESULTS <br />BEFORE AFTER <br />256 <br />222 <br />30.8 <br />26.0 <br />17 <br />13 <br />44 <br />52 <br />4 (2%) <br />12(5%) <br />125(49%) <br />184(83%) <br />80(31%) <br />20(9%) <br />47(18%) <br />6(3%) <br />There were 3.8 mile per hour (mph) and 4.8 mph decreases in average speed on <br />the downhill and uphill directions of travel, respectively. Both of these <br />differences are statistically significant at the 90% confidence level. The <br />proportion of vehicles in the "20-30 mph" category also increased significantly, <br />while the percentage in the "greater than 35" mph category decreased <br />significantly, also. These changes indicate that the four way stop has had a <br />