My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0042.060 2002-2004
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2002-2004
>
COM 0042.060 2002-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 1:02:27 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 12:52:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2002-2004
Communication
0042
Point
060
Author
Marie Aguilar, Kailua Village Merchant Association Sign Code Working Group
Communications - Referred To
Council
Comments
Council: Close file - 10/20/04
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 10/20/2004 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2002-2004\Council
AGE PC 01/04/2005 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Planning Committee (PC)
COM 0042.000 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2002-2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Rationale: reflects expansion of small business beyond the defined `core' which has <br /> occurred along Alii Drive during the past thirty years (i.e., Waterfront Row, Cocomrt <br /> Grove, Huggo's on the Rocks), eliminates inequitable restrictions/limitations between <br /> similar businesses within special district, and takes into account the probably future <br /> business expansion in the district and/or changes which may occur in the zoning code <br /> boundaries of the Kailua Village llesign District. <br /> B) Proposed amendment -delete Secl:ion 3-61 (4) restricting content of signage within KVDD to <br /> name of business only: <br /> 1) - l <br /> advertising. <br /> Rationale: eliminates restricting sign content to `name of business' only within Kailua <br /> Village Design District. Restricting a business from using signs to promote or advertise <br /> their product (generally defined as anything produced by natural or human effort) is not <br /> reasonable. <br /> C) Proposed amendment - revise Section 3-60 (a) to improve format consistency with related <br /> code in Article 1 and improve business frontage signage allowance to provide for basic visih~ility: <br /> 1) Section 3-60 (a) The total number of signs per business shall not exceed two signs <br /> per business front each of a different type nor one sign ner additional adjacent side <br /> or rear of a building associated with the business (excluding directorv signs). +Srrly <br /> Rationale: re-formats Article 2 consistent with Article 1 section relating to number of <br /> signs (Section 3-6 (b)(1) The total number of signs per lot or business shall not exceed <br /> two per adjacent street); eliminates potential conflicting interpretations of `one sign per <br /> street per building frontage' or `one sign per business'; <br /> Increases front signage to allow visibility from multi-direction approaches (e.g., a wall sign <br /> with direct approach visibility plus atwo-sided projecting sign with side approach <br /> visibility) and equivalent number of front signs as all other businesses. <br /> <br /> D) Proposed amendment - revise Section 3-58 (a)(1)(A) and (B) pertaining to ground signs and <br /> aggregate of all signage: <br /> 1) Section 3-58 (a)(1)(A) If lot frontage is up to 30 lineal feet, a ground sign may not <br /> exceed twelve square feet for a.ny building or portion of a building under separate <br /> management or control, , ' <br /> Page -5- 07/11/04 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.