Laserfiche WebLink
due to the significant environmental questions involved with mixed waste processing and <br /> the tact that the project would become the major element in the County's waste <br /> management strategy for East Hawaii, a full EIS would most likely be required. <br /> PRODUCTION OF A REFUSE DERIVED FUEL: <br /> The costs related to producing a RDF greatly exceed the fuel value of the product (shredded <br /> RDF is generally produced for on-site use, it is low density and costly to haul -for off-site <br /> use pelletizing is often required which adds additional costs) <br /> The utilization of the fuel in local boilers would require major modifications of emissions <br /> control systems, and generate an ash requiring disposal in a specially designated monofill. <br /> Politically it would be difficult and take a require a lengthy approval process to site and <br /> operate a MSW combustion facility. If the Plan is to develop a RDF processing facility as a <br /> Quick Fix you may find the project facing considerable delays. <br /> Based on Oahu's opposition to H-Power in the early 80's I would anticipate a land use <br /> <br /> approval battle in excess of five years. Can Hawaii afford to wait that long for a solution to <br /> your problem? Is there the political will to carry out this type of project through two <br /> <br /> elections? <br /> A RECOMMENDATION FOR THE COUNTY: <br /> Recycling is a fairly new and emerging technology and both the technical solutions and <br /> economics are improving annually. Rural collection systems are emerging which can <br /> overcome the remaining barrier, the inefficiencies of curbside collection in low density <br /> communities. Fiber prices, while fluctuating from recent high levels, now make collection of <br /> commercially generated source separated paper an economical alternative. Locking the <br /> county into a capital intensive, inflexible option may limit the County's choices in the future. <br /> The composting of MSW is an emerging technology which has received mixed reviews from <br /> existing mainland programs. Many composting operators are modifying their operations to <br /> process a select waste stream composed of source separated organics in order to minimize <br /> the processing costs and contamination problems, insure a higher value for non-compostable <br /> recyclables, and create a high grade product for marketing. At the same time existing Dirty <br /> MRFs are modifying their operations to process a waste stream composed of source <br /> separated residential recyclables and select commercial loads with a high fiber content, <br /> while handling yardwaste and commercial greenwaste through a separate system. Such a <br /> system can minimize the processing costs and contamination problems, insure a higher <br /> value for the recyclables and compostables, <br /> Nationally the trend is towards the development of multi-faceted facilities which provide <br /> flexibility and allow the community to minimize both capital and operating Costs. For <br /> Hawaii County this could include a source separated MRF with a capacity of roughly 50 <br /> tons/day in conjunction with a 100 ton/day transfer station to long haul the balance and <br /> "Clean Green" processing area for delivery to a separate composting operation. <br /> <br />