Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> legal action for selective and inequitable enforcement avoided, they must be <br /> <br /> uniformly and fairly interpreted. and actually enforced against all, not just <br /> one. <br /> 5. If the County of Hawaii establishes that any sign law. <br /> ordinance or r~ulation is applicable to the banners or fla¢s of the <br /> application and that the same have been and will be uniformly interpreted <br /> and enforced against all businesses with such banners or flays, the Applicant <br /> will cooperate as appropriate with the County. However, as indicated above <br /> and particularly in section 3 above, this does not yet appear to be the <br /> situation. Obviously, discriminatory interpretation and enforcement of <br /> commercial signage laws can have the effect of favoring certain competing <br /> businesses over others or creating advantages for some businesses and <br /> disadvantages for others. This can cause economic damages and potential <br /> liabilities and claims for compensation. <br /> 6. The Applicant is represented by Mark Van Pernis, and Van <br /> Pernis, Smith & Vancil in this matter. The County of Hawaii and its <br /> representatives are encouraged to contact him at any time in this matter. <br /> Dated: ~ , Kailua-Kona. Hawaii <br /> JOSE BUSINESS TRUST <br /> By <br /> Its Office Manager <br /> and By~J <br /> MART VAN PERNIS <br /> Attorney for Applicant <br /> 2 EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />