Laserfiche WebLink
residential district that was less desirable and <br /> compromised design standards codified in HCC Chapter 34 by <br /> minimal reference. <br /> 24. At Planning Commission hearings, Members of the <br /> public testified to the lack of convenient public access to <br /> the shoreline, inadequate spacing of public accesses to <br /> reach favorite rocky beaches, and the need for convenient <br /> open space for picnicking without fear of being washed away <br /> by a wave. <br /> 25. The Planning Commissioners asked the Planning <br /> Director if there was anything they could do for the those <br /> members of the public voicing complaint. The Planning <br /> Director directed the attention to the Subdivision <br /> Agreement each time and stated that the County had signed <br /> the Agreement to settle a dispute. The Commissioners were <br /> deterred from amending the conditions of approval in this <br /> manner. <br /> 26. The Subdivision Agreement compromised the <br /> standard requirements for spacing between public accesses <br /> to the shoreline for lands in the "RS" Residential and "A" <br /> <br /> Agriculture zoned districts, authorized under HCC <br /> 34-5(a)(1) and (3). <br /> 27. The Subdivision Agreement authorizes spacing <br /> <br /> between public accesses in the residential zoned district <br /> 7 <br /> <br />