My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0690.000 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0690.000 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2008 2:18:10 AM
Creation date
5/8/2008 11:46:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0690
Point
000
Author
Harry Kim, Mayor
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
Council: Bill 226 passes 2nd & final reading - 5/17/06 Council: Bill 227 amended to Draft 2 - 5/02/06 Council: Bill 226 passes first reading; did not adopt PC-65 - 5/02/06 PC-65: Forwards Bill 226 to Council with a negative recommendation - 4/18/06 PC-66: Forwards Bill 227 to Council with a negative recommendation - 4/18/06 PC: Posptoned to the Planning Committee meeting scheduled for 4/18/06 - 4/4/06
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 05/02/2006 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Council
AGE COUNCIL 05/17/2006 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Council
AGE PC 04/04/2006 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Planning Committee (PC)
AGE PC 04/18/2006 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Planning Committee (PC)
BIL 226 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2004-2006
BIL 226 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2004-2006
BIL 227 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2004-2006
BIL 227 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2004-2006
COM 0690.002 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
COM 0690.003 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
COM 0690.004 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
COM 0690.005 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
COM 0690.006 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
COM 0690.007 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
COM 0690.008 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
COM 0690.009 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
COM 0690.010 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
COM 0690.011 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
COM 0690.012 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
COM 0690.013 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
COM 0690.014 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
COM 0690.015 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
ORD 2006-077 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Ordinances\2006
ORD 2006-077 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Ordinances\2006
REP PC 065 04/18/2006 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2004-2006\Planning Committee (PC)
REP PC 065 04/18/2006 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2004-2006\Planning Committee (PC)
REP PC 066 04/18/2006 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2004-2006\Planning Committee (PC)
REP PC 066 04/18/2006 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2004-2006\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Stacy Higa, Chairman <br /> <br /> and Members of the County Council <br /> <br /> Page 10 <br /> provide access if the parcel immediately mauka of the subject property is developed <br /> someday. <br /> Conditions of approval will require this property to provide easements on project <br /> roads in favor of the mauka parcel so that if this property is developed it can use the same <br /> access to Alii Parkway and to Kuakini Highway. <br /> The Alii Parkway will create a high traffic roadway near the northern boundary of <br /> the subject property. This will create more noise, among other impacts. <br /> The potential for noise impacts from the Alii Parkway was discussed in the 1988 <br /> Enviromnental Impact Statement for the highway project, and the 1996 revision of the <br /> EIS. The Federal Highways Administration (FHWA) uses a "Leq" standard for noise <br /> impacts. The "Leq" standard combines the projected noise level with the time of <br /> exposure. The FHWA sets an Leq of 67 dBA as the maximum recommended noise level <br /> (outdoors) in a residential area. In the Hillcrest area, where the closest residence is about <br /> 150' from the highway, the 1996 EIS projected that in 2020, the Leq at 150 Feet from the <br /> highway would be about 61 dBA. It projected that a 23 feet separation from the highway <br /> to any residences would be sufficient to meet the 67 dBA standard in this general area. <br /> The acceptable distance is closer in this area than some other portions of Alii Parkway <br /> because the operating speed is supposed to be only 25 mph. <br /> The projection in the 1996 EIS was based on a four-lane highway carrying 38,000 <br /> vehicles per day. This is a very high volume of traffic. By comparison, the Queen <br /> Kaahumanu Highway, between the Nani Kailua and Hualalai Rd. intersections, had a <br /> traffic count of about 23,500 vehicles per day in 2002. Because the current plans for Alii <br /> Parkway call for atwo-lane road, which would not carry as many vehicles, it is <br /> reasonable that the noise levels at the proposed residential project can be expected to be <br /> below the 67 dBA Leq standard. Most of the proposed project is more than 80 feet from <br /> the Alii Parkway right-of--way, but four of the proposed fourplex buildings are about 40 <br /> feet from the right-of--way. <br /> It is also possible that mitigation may be necessary when noise levels significantly <br /> increase because of a new highway, even if noise does not reach the 67 dBA Leq <br /> standard. This is difficult to predict because it depends upon other ambient noise levels, <br /> and the federal government does not have a mandatory definition of what level of <br /> increase is considered significant. <br /> A condition of rezoning will require the project to be responsible for any noise <br /> mitigation required because of the construction of the Alii Parkway. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.