Laserfiche WebLink
14. Finally, 450 randomly-selected signatures of the 3,001 signatures submitted were <br /> compazed to those on file. No evidence was found to indicate that there was fraud or forgery. <br /> 15. Pursuant to Section 11-4(d), signers had unti14:30 p.m., Thursday, June 1, 2006, <br /> to file a written request with the Office of the County Clerk requesting that their signature be <br /> withdrawn. No request was received by that deadline date. <br /> 16. On June 5, 2006, a Certificate of Insufficiency, attached as Exhibit "D", <br /> determined that the initial petition contained 1,366 signatures of qualified voters of the County. <br /> The Certificate of Insufficiency was mailed by certified letter, return receipt on June 5, 2006, to <br /> the Committee. The Committee received the Certificate of Insufficiency on June 7, 2006. <br /> 17. By letter dated June 8, 2006, the Save Our Land Petitioners' Committee requested <br /> to amend the petition. Although the Committee had ten days to Saturday, June 17, 2006, to <br /> submit additional signatures, the official date to submit the amended petition was Monday, <br /> June 19, 2006. <br /> 18. On June 16 and June 19, 2006, the Save Our Land Petitioners' Committee <br /> submitted an additiona1755 and 87 supplementary petition pages, respectively, for a total of <br /> 1,253 petition pages. One page (#0000589) was inadvertently stamped twice, which explains <br /> <br /> why the last page of the petition is numbered `0001254.' Petition pages were returned to the <br /> Committee for lack of a notarized affidavit or because of the inaccuracy of a circulator's <br /> statement. Those pages have not been included in the supplementary total. <br /> 19. The supplementary petition contained a total of 5,781 signatories, for a total of <br /> 8,782 signatories on the petition. <br /> 20. On June 5, 2006, the Clerk received one request to withdraw the person's <br /> signature in the supplementary petition. <br /> 8 <br /> <br />