Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> From: Tim Rees (808) 959-5023 January 4, 2007 <br /> P.O. Box 1787 <br /> Pahoa, Hawaii 96778 <br /> To: All Hawaii County Council Members; 2006-2008 <br /> Subject: Addendum to Oral Testimony presented on January 4, 2007 Re: Bi11147 (Draft 2) <br /> Re: Bi11258 (Draft 6) <br /> These are my opinions on Bills: 147 and 258. <br /> Bill 147 (Draflt 2) <br /> Bill 147 is little more than a thinly disguised attempt to defeat Constitutional Rights to Due <br /> Process by mechanism of a "Legislative decriminalization" of conduct. There is no better way to <br /> demonstrate this than to explain the abuses that have occurred in our District Courts (with Bench <br /> Judges only - no juries) regarding HRS 249-2. These abuses would have ended immediately <br /> upon the first case brought before an unbiased jury of peers. However, since 1994 with the <br /> enactment of HRS Chapter 291 D (Adjudication of Traffic Infractions) the right to a jury trial is <br /> not allowed even if you are willing to pay all associated costs. The District Courts routinely and <br /> in some cases the Circuit Courts, have egregiously abused the simple premises of 291 D even <br /> though the Judiciary was given unprecedented access during the Legislative process and a <br /> continuing right to remediate any problems presented by the "decriminalization" process. <br /> Chapter 291D would have worked fine if we had Honest, Competent, and Unbiased Judges to <br /> implement it. This didn't happen. One of the biggest problems was that the Judges Statewide in <br /> @ 90% of contested citations did not allow informa1291 D-8 "Hearings" as contemplated by the <br /> Legislature. Instead, they would immediately enter Judgment for the State without any defense <br /> allowed; impose Fines and Court Costs; and Order a defendant back for a full HRPP "Trial" <br /> forcing them to pay up without any defense or have to take more time off work, hire an attorney <br /> to appear at the "Trial", etc. These actions were in direct contravention of Chapter 291 D and its <br /> rational purposes as eloquently stated in 291D-1: Purpose. Please read it when you have time. I <br /> have many Transcripts and Court Autolog tapes proving the above. Again, these circumstances <br /> would not have occurred but for the fact that the trust we place in twelve unbiased peers through <br /> our Social Contract was relegated to one fallible Bench Judge. Bill 147 Draft 2 anticipates a <br /> similaz reduction of Constitutional guarantees and should be defeated today. I spent many hours <br /> researching the records of the Third Circuit Court yesterday. I could find only one relevant case <br /> Comm. No. 2 <br /> Ref. Tod 1 <br /> Ref. Uate JAN 4 2067 <br /> <br />