Laserfiche WebLink
providing the desired services. Appropriate infrastructure and design <br />concerns shall be incorporated into the review of such developments..." <br />Page 5 "...In response to traffic concerns along Punahele Street and <br />the adverse impacts to adjoining residences should such an access <br />road be provided, the Planning director and the applicant have agreed <br />to delete a secondary access road to Punahele Street. This will <br />alleviate any traffic impacts to Punahele Street, which is a narrow <br />residential roadway not capable of supporting commercial traffic. The <br />elimination of this secondary access roadway will also spare the <br />residents along Punahele Street from the impacts such added traffic <br />would generate...." <br />Page 7 "...As recommended by the Department of Public works, a 6- <br />foot high privacy wall or other form of sound barrier will be required <br />along all of the common boundaries between the subject property and <br />the adjoining residential lots, including along the project's access point <br />on Punahele..." (Exhibit 6) <br />Page 2 of the Planning Commission's November 17, 1994 hearing <br />transcript: "...During this meeting, concerns regarding the proposed <br />development and the traffic generated were raised by the general <br />public as well as concerns regarding these conditions that were raised <br />by various governmental agencies. The Commission, at the request of <br />the department, continued this application, the hearing to allow staff <br />to work with the applicant in addressing some of these concerns. We <br />have done so and the applicants' most recent proposal is to delete this <br />access connection to Punahele Street, thereby alleviating concerns <br />regarding traffic and its impact to resident located in this area here. <br />Furthermore, that would then negate the necessity of having to have <br />Punahele Street upgraded to accommodate the commercial traffic..." <br />In the same document Dr. Takase and I are sworn in. What is <br />discussed in pages 3 through 10 are our neighborhood concerns and <br />Dr. Takase's proposals which we accepted in good faith trusting that <br />the statements were made also under oath. Also discussed is the <br />presence of Haitsuka Brothers' baseyard for the County funded Ainako <br />Sewer alignment project. (Exhibit 7) <br />The resulting letter dated December 5, 1994 from the Planning <br />Commission to Gelocag and Dr. Takase outlining the rezoning <br />conditions (Exhibit 8) <br />4 <br />