Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 20. Department of Finance-Real Property Tax (October 15, 1997 Memo): <br /> "Our records indicate that 4 acres is classified as agriculture. The applicant indicates <br /> an area of 3.925 acres as agriculture. We would be receptive to correcting our records <br /> if proven wrong. The 4 acres is enjoying an agricultural use assessment and a portion <br /> may be subject to retroactive taxes if converted from agriculture to urban. There are no <br /> other comments at this time." <br /> Applicant's Response: (See Exhibit E -November 12, 1997 Letter) <br /> 21. Department of Land and Natural Resources, Land Division (October 13, 1997 <br /> Letter): <br /> "Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to review and cottunent on the subject <br /> Change of Zone Application. <br /> "The Department of Land and Natural Resources has no comments to offer on the <br /> subject matter at this time." <br /> 22. Department of Transportation (September 24, 1997 Letter): <br /> "Thank you for your transmittal of September 17, 1997, requesting our review of the <br /> subject application. <br /> "The proposed project will no[ impact the State highway system. <br /> "Thank you for the opportunity to comment." <br /> 23. Department of Health (September 25, 1997 Memo): <br /> "Health Department found no environmental health concerns with regulatory <br /> implications in the submittals." <br /> 24. Department of Water Supply (October 15, 1997 Memo): <br /> "For your information, the property is serviced by an existing 1'h-inch meter. The <br /> applicant states that usage beyond the existing maximum daily consumption of 350 <br /> gallons per day is not anticipated. <br /> "Pursuant to the anticipated maximum daily water demand, the 1'h-inch meter is <br /> adequate for the proposed change of zone. Therefore, we have no objections to the <br /> subject application." <br /> -5- <br /> <br />