Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> developers postponing their projects, which result in fewer affordable units being <br /> built. <br /> On the other hand, if developers are provided with incentives, it will <br /> <br /> encourage them to build more housing supply in all price ranges for all income <br /> <br /> groups, including affordable rentals and housing. We understand that the <br /> County of Hawaii has an insufficient supply of rentals and for sale units for all <br /> income groups. In 2006, Maui County passed an affordable housing policy to try <br /> and address this issue; however, its requirements are so costly that it is <br /> discouraging the development of new market and affordable housing projects. <br /> Kauai County is also in the process of adopting a housing policy, and in its 2007 <br /> session, the Legislature was also trying to find ways to increase the supply of <br /> affordable housing. Over the years, Honolulu's affordable housing policy has <br /> resulted in the production of approximately 13,000 units. <br /> In 2004, LURF participated in the Joint Legislative Housing and Homeless <br /> Task Force, the Mayor of the City and County of Honolulu's Affordable Housing <br /> Advisory Committee, and Affordable Housing Task Force created by Senate <br /> Concurrent Resolution 135. It was clear to the participants in these efforts that <br /> one of the major problems is that an overall lack of housing supply <br /> resulted in a lack of affordable housing. It was also a consistent and common <br /> finding that in order to create more affordable housing opportunities, there <br /> was a need to provide more housing in all income catectories. The <br /> problems of a lack of affordable housing and a lack of overall housing <br /> supply cannot be solved by burdening landowners and developers with <br /> aggressive government exactions and inclusionary zoning requirements. <br /> The crux of the problem is not the new jobs that are being generated but, <br /> rather, the lack of affordable workforce housing available. These are two related, <br /> but distinct, problems which should not be linked together. <br /> The connection between housing and income is generally explained as <br /> follows: Employers generally look for an educated work force and affordability in <br /> housing when locating or expanding businesses. From a public policy <br /> standpoint, if the State and counties want to attract employers to provide higher <br /> paying jobs for our residences both now in the future, it is imperative that the <br /> State and counties provide incentives to developers and land owners to insure an <br /> adequate supply of housing for all income levels. <br /> We need both new employment opportunities and affordable workforce <br /> housing. Rather than placing an affordable housing burden on investors who are <br /> bringing new jobs to the market, the government should consider what could or <br /> should be done to increase the supply of affordable workforce housing. <br /> Increasing the supply of housing would create housing opportunities to those <br /> who could be employed in the new jobs. <br /> <br />