Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 37. Department of Agriculture, HELCO, Office of Housing and Community <br /> Development, and Soil Conservation Service: No comments. <br /> <br /> -ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM APPLICANTS <br /> <br /> 38. Traffic Analysis: According to the Traffic Analysis submitted by the applicants, "the <br /> <br /> construction of this proposed building should increase the traffic load on Hualalai Road." <br /> During the peak morning rush hour the new building will generate an additional 22.4 trips <br /> per hour, and during the peak afternoon rush hour the new building will generate an <br /> additional 23.8 trips per hour. <br /> <br /> According to Appendix A of the Traffic Analysis, peak a.m. southeastbound traffic on <br /> Hualalai Road would remain at Level of Service E, or characterized by "very long traffic <br /> delays," as a result of the new building. Appendix A indicates that peak p.m. <br /> southeastbound traffic would improve from Level of Service E to Level of Service D, or <br /> characterized by "long traffic delays," as a result of the new building. However, page 4 <br /> of the report states that 44% of the p.m. traffic on HuaWai Road is toward the southeast. <br /> Based on the engineer's estimate that the new building would generate an additional 23.8 <br /> trips during the peak afternoon rush hour, with 44% of these trips heading to the <br /> southeast, it is difficult to understand how the peak p.m. southeastbound level of service <br /> would improve as a result of the project. The Department of Public Works confirmed <br /> that this calculation is in error, and that the peak p.m. southeastbound traffic will remain <br /> at Level of Service E after the completion of the project. <br /> <br /> The project will apparently not generate enough additional traffic to cause a decrease in <br /> the level of service on HualaW Road to Level F, or "when demand volume exceeds the <br /> capacity of the lane, extreme delays will be encountered with queuing which may cause <br /> severe congestion affecting other traffic movements in the intersection. This condition <br /> usually warrants improvement to the intersection." (See Exhibit K - Traffic Analysis.) <br /> <br /> 39. Sight Distance Analysis: "Due to the extremely short sight distance available from the <br /> southern side of the parcel, an alternate driveway location furthest from the above <br /> mentioned rock outcropping along the northern boundary of the parcel was also analyzed. <br /> <br /> Observations taken from the center of a proposed driveway at this location yield a sight <br /> distance of 140 feet to the south (left when exiting) and 680 feet to the north (right when- <br /> exiting). The sight distance to the south remains over 80 feet less than what is required <br /> by the Uniform Design Manual. A field determination was made regarding the sight <br /> distance to the south from this location should the rock outcropping be removed. The <br /> sight distance to the south in this instance would be 180 feet, still less than required by <br /> some 40 feet. <br /> <br /> The sight distance requirements of the Uniform Design Manual will be very difficult, if <br /> not impossible, to meet within the confines of the parcel's present boundaries. <br /> <br /> 10 <br />