COM 0827.000 1996-1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Ms. Virginia Goldstein, Director January 5, 1998 Page 3 The concept of incremental zoning based on actual construction performance standards is no longer operable. The tests are more related to adequacy of infrastructure and a timetable that is consistent with the Subdivision Code. b. Re-wording the construction and performance requirements for the commercial and multiple-family residential area, as the existing timetable is not consistent with current practice; and c. Requiring the submittal of an overall master plan for the Planning Director's review and approval before the processing of any subdivision and/or development plans within the subject site. This would allow for a comprehensive rather than a piecemeal review of the entire property. 2. Infrastructural Requirements and Their Schedule Conditions I and J relate to drainage and roadway systems. Specifically: • Condition I generally referred to drainage systems being installed, and • Condition J required roadway improvements, street layouts, and on-site construction road. The applicant is proposing that there be more explicit articulation and clarification of the drainage and roadway requirements, including their construction timetable. Additionally, there would also be a new condition reflecting the development of a solid waste management plan. 3. Development and/or Design Requirements Conditions K & L relate to archaeological requirements, while Condition M addresses the affordable housing requirement. The issue of "ohana" housing was not addressed. As such, in this set of amendments, the following are being proposed: a. Updating Conditions K & L to make the reference to the appropriate agency more current,