Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> commercial complex completed three years thereafter. <br /> <br /> "What is being proposed here are the: <br /> <br /> a. Deletion of the incremental zoning and housing construction performance <br /> requirement and their re-wording to make it consistent with prevailing <br /> policies relative to infrastructure. <br /> <br /> The concept of incremental zoning based on actual construction <br /> performance standards is no longer operable. The tests are more related <br /> to adequacy of infrastructure and a timetable that is more consistent with <br /> the Subdivision Code. <br /> <br /> b. Re-wording the construction and performance requirements for the <br /> commercial and multiple-family residential area, as the existing timetable <br /> is not consistent with current practices; and <br /> <br /> c. Requiring the submittal of an overall master plan for the Planning <br /> Director's review and approval before the processing of any subdivision <br /> and/or development plans within the subject site. This would allow for a <br /> comprehensive rather than a piecemeal review of the entire property. <br /> <br /> "2. Infrastructure Requirements and Their Schedule <br /> <br /> Conditions I and J relate to drainage and roadway systems. Specifically: <br /> <br /> • Condition I generally referred to drainage systems being installed; and <br /> <br /> • Condition J required roadway improvements, street layouts, and on-site <br /> <br /> construction road. <br /> <br /> The applicant is proposing that there be more explicit articulation and <br /> clarification of the drainage and roadway requirements, including their <br /> construction timetable. Additionally, there would also be a new condition <br /> reflecting the development of a solid waste management plan. <br /> <br /> "I Development and/or Design Requirements <br /> <br /> Conditions K & L relate to archaeological requirements, while Condition M <br /> addresses the affordable housing requirement. The issue of 'ohana' housing was <br /> not addressed. As such, in this set of amendments, the following are being <br /> proposed: <br /> <br /> <br /> -4- <br />