My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
RES 686 Draft 01 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Resolutions
>
2006-2008
>
RES 686 Draft 01 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2019 9:09:52 AM
Creation date
6/19/2008 2:59:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Bill/Resolution
Bill/Resolution - Type
RES
Bill/Resolution - Council Term
2006-2008
Bill/Resolution
686
Draft
01
Introducer
Pete Hoffmann, Council Chair
Referred To
PC
Action 1
PC-88: Recommends adoption of Res. 686-08 - 7/1/08
Action 2
Council: Adopts Res. 686-08 & PC-88 - 7/23/08
Status
Adopted
Date To Mayor or Adoption Date
7/23/2008
Reading Number
1
Reading Date
7/23/2008
Ayes
8-Ford; Higa; Hoffmann; Jacobson; Naeole; Pilago; Yagong; Yoshimoto
Noes
0
Absent
1-Ikeda
Excused
0
Comments
$Bill/Resolution_Comments$
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2008/07/23 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Council
AGE COUNCIL 2008/07/23 2006-2008 ACTIONS
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Council
COM 1295.000 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2006-2008
REP PC 088 07/01/2008 2006-2008
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2006-2008\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(2) The TIAR shall assess impacts to transportation facilities in the immediate vicinity and <br />general area of the project, and to the transportation facilities serving the project area. <br />(3) The TIAR shall include projections for future growth in traffic, for a minimum of five, ten, <br />and twenty years, and shall include other approved or proposed development that is expected to impact <br />the project area, with reasonable assumptions about the build-out of such development. <br />(4) The TIAR shall present an assessment of the impacts of the project on LOS and an evaluation <br />of alternative plans for mitigating those impacts. The evaluation shall include budgetary cost estimates <br />for the capital and operating costs of promising alternative plans. <br />(e) Mitigation Required. <br />(1 } If the LOS for any transportation facility in the project area is (A) currently worse than the <br />acceptable level of service, or (B) projected to become worse than the acceptable level of service during <br />the five year period of the TIAR, any rezoning of the property, if approved, shall contain conditions that <br />require mitigation of adverse traffic effects before occupancy of the project is permitted, or that <br />occupancy be delayed until the level of service has reached the acceptable level and is no longer <br />projected to be worse than the acceptable level. <br />(2) Where the LOS deficiency is due to roadway or intersection deficiencies in the immediate <br />vicinity of the project, the conditions of zoning shall require local mitigation. Where the deficiency in <br />LOS is due to insufficient capacity in the transportation facilities serving the project area, the conditions <br />of zoning shall require area mitigation. <br />(3) If there is more than one way to mitigate an adverse effect, the director shall present to the <br />council the pros and cons of the alternatives. <br />(f) Mitigation requirements will be deemed satisfied when: <br />(1) A public agency has committed funds for area mitigation that will remove the I.OS <br />deficiency. In the case of the State, commitment of funds means that the governor has released funds to <br />complete the improvement. In the case of the County, commitment of funds means that the council has <br />appropriated funds to complete the improvement; or <br />(2) The private developer's commitment to implement mitigation has been secured by bond or <br />equivalent security, or mandatory participation in an improvement district, community facilities district, <br />or other equivalent means of guaranteeing performance. <br />(g) A developer's area mitigation expenses shall be credited against any fair share or similar fee <br />requirement for roads. A developer's local mitigation expenses shall be credited against any fair share or <br />similar fee requirement for roads if the council determines that the mitigation substantially benefits the <br />general public and was not necessary primarily for the benefit of the project. In general, roads that are <br />necessary for access to or within a development or turn lanes for a private project shall not qualify for <br />fair sl-iare credit. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.