Laserfiche WebLink
September 19, 2008 . <br />The Honorable Pete Hoffmann, Chairperson, and Council Members <br />Page 3 <br />legally use after September 2009. Compare this to the larger stores where most if not <br />all of them will be able to use up their present stock within a year. Smaller stores, to <br />take advantage of the economies of scale, are more likely to purchase and have on <br />hand an excess of plastic bags extending beyond a year's supply. <br />A review of the effective date of measures in other jurisdictions shows that with the <br />exception of San Francisco, a longer transition time has been generally allowed. (For <br />your information, San Francisco's ban became effective in six months for <br />supermarkets and in 12 months for pharmacies. However, the SF ban only applies to <br />supermarkets with gross annual sales in excess of $2 million, and retail pharmacies <br />with at least five locations under the same ownership within the city of San Francisco. <br />No small businesses are subject to the ban.) <br />Penalties - It is felt that the fine and community service penalty proposed in Bill 326 <br />Draft 2 is too high. Amore reasonable penalty provided in the pioneering San <br />Francisco law, for example, is a fine not exceeding $100 for the first violation, up to a <br />$500 fine for the third violation within,a single year. <br />In addition, as discussed at the August 27 Council meeting, the penalty section refers <br />to "persons" being penalized, not "businesses." According to Corporation Counsel, . <br />this could result in any person employed by a business being cited under this section. <br />For example, in the case of a supermarket, a clerk bagging the groceries in plastic bags <br />could be cited and fined rather than the responsible management of the store. While <br />this may seem an unlikely possibility, it could happen under the bill as written. <br />A third issue with the penalty section is that it provides for fines collected under the <br />section to be deposited in the County's Public Access, Open Space and Natural <br />Resources Fund. Bi11326 Draft 2 provides that upon conviction, a person is sentenced <br />to pay the fine and/or perform community service. Being "convicted" implies that this <br />is a matter that will be taken up at District Court. Fines collected by the Court are kept <br />by the State of Hawaii and are not available to the County. <br />Location in the Hawaii County Code -Bill 326 Draft 2 amends Chapter 20 of the <br />Hawaii County Code, which deals with refuse and solid waste. Since the bill does not <br />ban plastic from landfills or transfer stations, but rather bans the retail distribution of <br />plastic bags, there is a question whether this is the appropriate section of the Code for <br />such a provision. Instead, it might have been better placed in Chapter 14, General <br />Welfare. <br />OTHER CONCERNS <br />The above concerns aze specific to Bi11326 Draft 2 as passed by the Council. If a ban on <br />plastic bags is desired as a statement of policy, these concerns could be addressed in a new <br />bill. <br />